pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1607.05566 · v3 · submitted 2016-07-19 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Is the newly reported X(5568) a Bbar{K} molecular state?

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords molecularisoscalarnewlyreportedstatestatessystemsassigned
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this work, we perform a dynamical study of the $B^{(*)}$ and $\bar K$ interaction and show that the newly reported $X(5568)$ or $X(5616)$ cannot be assigned to be an isovector $B\bar{K}$ or $B^*\bar{K}$ molecular state. We continue to investigate the isoscalar $B^{(*)}\bar{K}$ systems, and the $B^{(*)}\bar{K}$ systems with isospin $I=0,1$, and predict the existence of several isoscalar $B^{(*)}\bar K^{(*)}$ molecular states. A new task of exploring open-bottom molecular states will be created for future experiments.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $T^a_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)$, $T_{cs0}^*(2870)^0$, and other singly-heavy tetraquark states

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A mass splitting model anchored to X(4140) interprets LHCb's T^a_c sbar0(2900) and T_cs0*(2870)^0 as particular singly-heavy tetraquarks and forecasts several narrow states.