Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Super-GUT CMSSM Revisited

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 18 Aug 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Typically, these allowed regions appear for $m_0$ and $m_{1/2}$ in the multi-TeV region, for suitable values of the unknown SU(5) GUT-scale phases and superpotential couplings, and with the ratio of supersymmetric Higgs vacuum expectation values $\tan \beta \lesssim 6$.

how it is stated · asserted 0.65 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1608.05370 (version 2)
Pith IDJBKTVZOB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAzar Mustafayev, Jason L. Evans, John Ellis, Keith A. Olive, Natsumi Nagata. "The Super-GUT CMSSM Revisited." arXiv:1608.05370 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/JBKTVZOB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,822 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.38 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.93 · compares with prior results 0.48 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We revisit minimal supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification (GUT) models in which the soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters of the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) are universal at some input scale, $M_{in}$, above the supersymmetric gauge coupling unification scale, $M_{GUT}$. As in the constrained MSSM (CMSSM), we assume that the scalar masses and gaugino masses have common values, $m_0$ and $m_{1/2}$ respectively, at $M_{in}$, as do the trilinear soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters $A_0$. Going beyond previous studies of such a super-GUT CMSSM scenario, we explore the constraints imposed by the lower limit on the proton lifetime and the LHC measurement of the Higgs mass, $m_h$. We find regions of $m_0$, $m_{1/2}$, $A_0$ and the parameters of the SU(5) superpotential that are compatible with these and other phenomenological constraints such as the density of cold dark matter, which we assume to be provided by the lightest neutralino. Typically, these allowed regions appear for $m_0$ and $m_{1/2}$ in the multi-TeV region, for suitable values of the unknown SU(5) GUT-scale phases and superpotential couplings, and with the ratio of supersymmetric Higgs vacuum expectation values $\tan \beta \lesssim 6$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We revisit minimal supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification (GUT) models in which the soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters of the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) are universal at some input scale, $M_{in}$, above the supersymmetric gauge coupling unification scale, $M_{GUT}$. background 0.62 0.44 0.03 asserted 0.78
s1 As in the constrained MSSM (CMSSM), we assume that the scalar masses and gaugino masses have common values, $m_0$ and $m_{1/2}$ respectively, at $M_{in}$, as do the trilinear soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters $A_0$. method 0.80 0.49 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Going beyond previous studies of such a super-GUT CMSSM scenario, we explore the constraints imposed by the lower limit on the proton lifetime and the LHC measurement of the Higgs mass, $m_h$. contribution 0.97 0.80 0.04 asserted 0.92
s3 We find regions of $m_0$, $m_{1/2}$, $A_0$ and the parameters of the SU(5) superpotential that are compatible with these and other phenomenological constraints such as the density of cold dark matter, which we assume to be provided by the lightest neutralino. result 0.96 0.95 0.50 asserted 1.00
s4 Typically, these allowed regions appear for $m_0$ and $m_{1/2}$ in the multi-TeV region, for suitable values of the unknown SU(5) GUT-scale phases and superpotential couplings, and with the ratio of supersymmetric Higgs vacuum expectation values $\tan \beta \lesssim 6$. result 1.00 0.90 0.61 asserted 0.65

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.70 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.81.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We revisit minimal supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification (GUT) models in which the soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters of the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) are universal at some input scale, $M_{in}$, above the supersymmetric gauge coupling unification scale, $M_{GUT}$. As in the constrained MSSM (CMSSM), we assume that the scalar masses and gaugino masses have common values, $m_0$ and $m_{1/2}$ respectively, at $M_{in}$, as do the trilinear soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters $A_0$. Going beyond previous studies of such a super-GUT CMSSM scenario, we explore the constraints imposed by the lower limit on the proton lifetime and the LHC measurement of the Higgs mass, $m_h$. We find regions of $m_0$, $m_{1/2}$, $A_0$ and the parameters of the SU(5) superpotential that are compatible with these and other phenomenological constraints such as the density of cold dark matter, which we assume to be provided by the lightest neutralino. Typically, these allowed regions appear for $m_0$ and $m_{1/2}$ in the multi-TeV region, for suitable values of the unknown SU(5) GUT-scale phases and superpotential couplings, and with the ratio of supersymmetric Higgs vacuum expectation values $\tan \beta \lesssim 6$.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

35 arXiv papers cite this in 103 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 73 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Builds on it 1 paper
  • Because the vev of $Σ$ is deflected by the soft masses, the $F$-term of $Σ$ becomes non-zero and is given by [equation] We can now use these expressions to compute the MSSM Higgs $μ$ and $B$ terms [These expressions, as well as Eq. ([ref]), generalize those derived in [ref] by including the contributions of the higher-dimensional operators.], [equation] where [equation] It can be shown that this parameter is scale-independent.

    Planck-Scale Effects on Nucleon Decay in Minimal Supersymmetric SU(5) · The Model · 0.98

Uses its method or tool 3 papers
  • The coefficient of the operator [ref], $c$, as well as the unified coupling, $g_5$, and the adjoint Higgs VEV, $V$, are determined using Eqs. ([ref]–[ref]) as was done in Refs. [ref] .

    A Minimal SU(5) SuperGUT in Pure Gravity Mediation · Summary · 0.93

  • We employ GUT relations among the soft terms derived from the unification group structure [ref] .

    Dark Matter, Sparticle Spectroscopy and Muon $(g-2)$ in $SU(4)_c \times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R$ · The $SU(4)_c ×SU(2)_L ×SU(2)_R$ model · 0.84

  • We use the same matching conditions as used in Ref. [ref] , namely [equation] for the third-generation Yukawa couplings, [These conditions are also used in Ref. [ref] . ] while for the first- and second-generations we use [equation] where $f_u_i(M_GUT)$, $f_d_i(M_GUT)$, and $f_e_i(M_GUT)$ are the up-type, down-type, and charged lepton Yukawa couplings at the GUT scale $M_GUT$, respectively, and $V_ij$ are the CKM matrix elements.

    Supersymmetric Proton Decay Revisited · Minimal Supersymmetric SU(5) GUT Model · 0.97

Compares with it 5 papers
Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 11 papers
  • In super-GUT models [ref] , the soft supersymmetry-breaking mass parameters are taken to be universal at some input scale, $$, that is greater than the GUT scale, $M_GUT$.

    Low-Energy Probes of No-Scale SU(5) Super-GUTs · Soft Supersymmetry Breaking · 0.97

  • We apply these considerations to various GUT models in Section [ref], including the constrained minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM) in which the soft supersymm- etry-breaking sfermion and gaugino masses are assumed to be universal at the GUT scale in Section [ref] [ref] , super-GUT models in which universality is imposed at a scale higher than the GUT scale [ref] in Section [ref], and sub-GUT models in which universality is imposed a lower scale [ref] in Section [ref].

    Supersymmetric Proton Decay Revisited · Introduction · 0.81

  • In constrained models such as the CMSSM [ref] , all soft scalar masses are unified with the same input value $m_0$ at some high energy scale, $M_in$, which may be equal to the GUT scale, as in the CMSSM, or less (as in sub-GUT models [ref] ), or greater than the GUT scale (as in super-GUT models [ref] ), and similarly for gaugino masses, $m_1/2$, and trilinear terms, $A_0$.

    Superstring-Inspired Particle Cosmology: Inflation, Neutrino Masses, Leptogenesis, Dark Matter & the SUSY Scale · Phenomenological Aspects of Entropy Production · 1.00

What it cites · 47 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 7 papers
Uses data or values from 6 papers
Cites as support 5 papers
  • The strong constraint from the $p→K^+ ν$ decay may, however, be evaded if the masses of supersymmetric particles are well above the electroweak scale [ref] .

    EDM Signatures of PeV-scale Superpartners · Proton Decay and GUT-Scale Phases · 0.97

  • The strong constraint from the $p→K^+ ν$ decay may, however, be evaded if the masses of supersymmetric particles are well above the electroweak scale [ref] .

    Decoupling Can Revive Minimal Supersymmetric SU(5) · Proton Decay and GUT-Scale Phases · 0.97

  • The strong constraint from the $p→K^+ ν$ decay may, however, be evaded if the masses of supersymmetric particles are well above the electroweak scale [ref] .

    Sfermion Flavor and Proton Decay in High-Scale Supersymmetry · Proton Decay and GUT-Scale Phases · 0.97

Cites as background 15 papers
  • Fewer studies have been performed for scenarios in which the soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters are universal at some other scale $M_in M_GUT$, which might be either below the GUT scale (so-called sub-GUT or GUT-less scenarios [ref] ) or above the GUT scale (so-called super-GUT scenarios [ref] ).

    SUSY-GUTs, SUSY-Seesaw and the Neutralino Dark Matter · Introduction · 0.95

  • Fewer studies have been performed for scenarios in which the soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters are universal at some other scale $M_in M_GUT$, which might be either below the GUT scale (so-called sub-GUT or GUT-less scenarios [ref] ) or above the GUT scale (so-called super-GUT scenarios [ref] ).

    Beyond the CMSSM without an Accelerator: Proton Decay and Direct Dark Matter Detection · Introduction · 0.95

  • Fewer studies have been performed for scenarios in which the soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters are universal at some other scale $M_in M_GUT$, which might be either below the GUT scale (so-called sub-GUT or GUT-less scenarios [ref] ) or above the GUT scale (so-called super-GUT scenarios [ref] ).

    What if Supersymmetry Breaking Unifies beyond the GUT Scale? · Introduction · 0.95

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.