Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Power of Uninitialized Qubits in Shallow Quantum Circuits

Quantum Physics · Submitted 25 Aug 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Since it seems unlikely that these tasks can be done with only $O(\log n)$ initialized ancillary qubits, our results give evidences that adding uninitialized ancillary qubits increases the computational power of shallow quantum circuits with only $O(\log n)$ initialized ancillary qubits.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.93 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1608.07020 (version 3)
Pith ID6EY4Q4WD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationSeiichiro Tani, Yasuhiro Takahashi. "Power of Uninitialized Qubits in Shallow Quantum Circuits." arXiv:1608.07020 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/6EY4Q4WD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,538 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.93 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.40 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.81 · compares with prior results 0.67 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the computational power of shallow quantum circuits with $O(\log n)$ initialized and $n^{O(1)}$ uninitialized ancillary qubits, where $n$ is the input length and the initial state of the uninitialized ancillary qubits is arbitrary. First, we show that such a circuit can compute any symmetric function on $n$ bits that is classically computable in polynomial time. Then, we regard such a circuit as an oracle and show that a polynomial-time classical algorithm with the oracle can estimate the elements of any unitary matrix corresponding to a constant-depth quantum circuit on $n$ qubits. Since it seems unlikely that these tasks can be done with only $O(\log n)$ initialized ancillary qubits, our results give evidences that adding uninitialized ancillary qubits increases the computational power of shallow quantum circuits with only $O(\log n)$ initialized ancillary qubits. Lastly, to understand the limitations of uninitialized ancillary qubits, we focus on near-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with them and show the impossibility of computing the parity function on $n$ bits.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the computational power of shallow quantum circuits with $O(\log n)$ initialized and $n^{O(1)}$ uninitialized ancillary qubits, where $n$ is the input length and the initial state of the uninitialized ancillary qubits is arbitrary. contribution 0.76 0.38 0.05 unclear 0.52
s1 First, we show that such a circuit can compute any symmetric function on $n$ bits that is classically computable in polynomial time. result 1.00 0.94 0.24 asserted 1.00
s2 Then, we regard such a circuit as an oracle and show that a polynomial-time classical algorithm with the oracle can estimate the elements of any unitary matrix corresponding to a constant-depth quantum circuit on $n$ qubits. result 0.95 0.92 0.12 asserted 1.00
s3 Since it seems unlikely that these tasks can be done with only $O(\log n)$ initialized ancillary qubits, our results give evidences that adding uninitialized ancillary qubits increases the computational power of shallow quantum circuits with only $O(\log n)$ initialized ancillary qubits. interpretation 1.00 0.59 0.72 hedged possibility 0.93
s4 Lastly, to understand the limitations of uninitialized ancillary qubits, we focus on near-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with them and show the impossibility of computing the parity function on $n$ bits. limitation 0.60 0.95 0.11 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the computational power of shallow quantum circuits with $O(\log n)$ initialized and $n^{O(1)}$ uninitialized ancillary qubits, where $n$ is the input length and the initial state of the uninitialized ancillary qubits is arbitrary. First, we show that such a circuit can compute any symmetric function on $n$ bits that is classically computable in polynomial time. Then, we regard such a circuit as an oracle and show that a polynomial-time classical algorithm with the oracle can estimate the elements of any unitary matrix corresponding to a constant-depth quantum circuit on $n$ qubits. Since it seems unlikely that these tasks can be done with only $O(\log n)$ initialized ancillary qubits, our results give evidences that adding uninitialized ancillary qubits increases the computational power of shallow quantum circuits with only $O(\log n)$ initialized ancillary qubits. Lastly, to understand the limitations of uninitialized ancillary qubits, we focus on near-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with them and show the impossibility of computing the parity function on $n$ bits.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Cites as background 1 paper
  • Much attention has been paid to the computational power of shallow (i.e., polylogarithmic-depth) quantum circuits [ref] .

    Quantum advantage with shallow circuits · Background and Main Results · 1.00

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.