Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Cross-validation estimation of covariance parameters under fixed-domain asymptotics

Statistics Theory · Submitted 10 Oct 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Under fixed-domain asymptotics, we prove the strong consistency and asymptotic normality of a cross validation estimator of the microergodic covariance parameter.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1610.02872 (version 2)
Pith IDQAGJQNND, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAgnes Lagnoux (1), Francois Bachoc (1), Thi Mong Ngoc Nguyen (1) ((1) IMT). "Cross-validation estimation of covariance parameters under fixed-domain asymptotics." arXiv:1610.02872 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/QAGJQNND
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,703 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.96 · states limitation 0.25 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.14 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.66 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider a one-dimensional Gaussian process having exponential covariance function. Under fixed-domain asymptotics, we prove the strong consistency and asymptotic normality of a cross validation estimator of the microergodic covariance parameter. In this setting, Ying [40] proved the same asymptotic properties for the maximum likelihood estimator. Our proof includes several original or more involved components, compared to that of Ying. Also, while the asymptotic variance of maximum likelihood does not depend on the triangular array of observation points under consideration, that of cross validation does, and is shown to be lower and upper bounded. The lower bound coincides with the asymptotic variance of maximum likelihood. We provide examples of triangular arrays of observation points achieving the lower and upper bounds. We illustrate our asymptotic results with simulations, and provide extensions to the case of an unknown mean function. To our knowledge, this work constitutes the first fixed-domain asymptotic analysis of cross validation.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider a one-dimensional Gaussian process having exponential covariance function. background 0.59 0.29 0.02 asserted 0.97
s1 Under fixed-domain asymptotics, we prove the strong consistency and asymptotic normality of a cross validation estimator of the microergodic covariance parameter. result 0.73 0.96 0.86 asserted 1.00
s2 In this setting, Ying [40] proved the same asymptotic properties for the maximum likelihood estimator. background 1.00 0.03 0.06 asserted 1.00
s3 Our proof includes several original or more involved components, compared to that of Ying. contribution 0.95 0.78 0.05 asserted 1.00
s4 Also, while the asymptotic variance of maximum likelihood does not depend on the triangular array of observation points under consideration, that of cross validation does, and is shown to be lower and upper bounded. result 0.99 0.90 0.13 asserted 1.00
s5 The lower bound coincides with the asymptotic variance of maximum likelihood. result 0.99 0.82 0.10 asserted 1.00
s6 We provide examples of triangular arrays of observation points achieving the lower and upper bounds. contribution 0.58 0.95 0.05 asserted 1.00
s7 We illustrate our asymptotic results with simulations, and provide extensions to the case of an unknown mean function. contribution 0.69 0.95 0.06 asserted 1.00
s8 To our knowledge, this work constitutes the first fixed-domain asymptotic analysis of cross validation. gap 0.60 0.47 0.16 asserted 0.81

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider a one-dimensional Gaussian process having exponential covariance function. Under fixed-domain asymptotics, we prove the strong consistency and asymptotic normality of a cross validation estimator of the microergodic covariance parameter. In this setting, Ying [40] proved the same asymptotic properties for the maximum likelihood estimator. Our proof includes several original or more involved components, compared to that of Ying. Also, while the asymptotic variance of maximum likelihood does not depend on the triangular array of observation points under consideration, that of cross validation does, and is shown to be lower and upper bounded. The lower bound coincides with the asymptotic variance of maximum likelihood. We provide examples of triangular arrays of observation points achieving the lower and upper bounds. We illustrate our asymptotic results with simulations, and provide extensions to the case of an unknown mean function. To our knowledge, this work constitutes the first fixed-domain asymptotic analysis of cross validation.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.