Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Box constrained $\ell_1$ optimization in random linear systems -- finite dimensions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1612.06839 v1 pith:ZLGODZ5M submitted 2016-12-20 math.OC cs.ITmath.ITmath.PR

classification math.OCcs.ITmath.ITmath.PR
keywords citestojnicl1bnbxasymldpasymptoticbinaryfiniteresultssystemsanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Our companion work \cite{Stojnicl1BnBxasymldp} considers random under-determined linear systems with box-constrained sparse solutions and provides an asymptotic analysis of a couple of modified $\ell_1$ heuristics adjusted to handle such systems (we refer to these modifications of the standard $\ell_1$ as binary and box $\ell_1$). Our earlier work \cite{StojnicISIT2010binary} established that the binary $\ell_1$ does exhibit the so-called phase-transition phenomenon (basically the same phenomenon well-known through earlier considerations to be a key feature of the standard $\ell_1$, see, e.g. \cite{DonohoPol,DonohoUnsigned,StojnicCSetam09,StojnicUpper10}). Moreover, in \cite{StojnicISIT2010binary}, we determined the precise location of the co-called phase-transition (PT) curve. On the other hand, in \cite{Stojnicl1BnBxasymldp} we provide a much deeper understanding of the PTs and do so through a large deviations principles (LDP) type of analysis. In this paper we complement the results of \cite{Stojnicl1BnBxasymldp} by leaving the asymptotic regime naturally assumed in the PT and LDP considerations aside and instead working in a finite dimensional setting. Along the same lines, we provide for both, the binary and the box $\ell_1$, precise finite dimensional analyses and essentially determine their ultimate statistical performance characterizations. On top of that, we explain how the results created here can be utilized in the asymptotic setting, considered in \cite{Stojnicl1BnBxasymldp}, as well. Finally, for the completeness, we also present a collection of results obtained through numerical simulations and observe that they are in a massive agreement with our theoretical calculations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Controlled Loosening-up (CLuP) -- achieving exact MIMO ML in polynomial time

    cs.IT 2019-09 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLuP, an iterative convex optimization algorithm, is claimed to achieve MIMO ML detection performance in polynomial time, but the claim rests on heuristic random duality arguments and an empirical iteration count.

  2. Complexity analysis of the Controlled Loosening-up (CLuP) algorithm

    cs.IT 2019-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using Random Duality Theory, the paper argues that the CLuP algorithm reaches near-optimal MIMO ML detection in a small, dimension-independent number of quadratic-programming iterations.

  3. Starting CLuP with polytope relaxation

    cs.IT 2019-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CLuP-plt, a CLuP detector variant that starts from a box-constrained least-squares solution, reaches near-ML error rates within three to five iterations in the tested MIMO settings.

Pith tools