Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Jointly Extracting Relations with Class Ties via Effective Deep Ranking

Artificial Intelligence · Submitted 22 Dec 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our model outperforms the baselines significantly, achieving state-of-the-art performance.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1612.07602 (version 4)
Pith ID3B4F3COW, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHai Ye, Wenhan Chao, Zhoujun Li, Zhunchen Luo. "Jointly Extracting Relations with Class Ties via Effective Deep Ranking." arXiv:1612.07602 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/3B4F3COW
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,084 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.89 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Connections between relations in relation extraction, which we call class ties, are common. In distantly supervised scenario, one entity tuple may have multiple relation facts. Exploiting class ties between relations of one entity tuple will be promising for distantly supervised relation extraction. However, previous models are not effective or ignore to model this property. In this work, to effectively leverage class ties, we propose to make joint relation extraction with a unified model that integrates convolutional neural network (CNN) with a general pairwise ranking framework, in which three novel ranking loss functions are introduced. Additionally, an effective method is presented to relieve the severe class imbalance problem from NR (not relation) for model training. Experiments on a widely used dataset show that leveraging class ties will enhance extraction and demonstrate the effectiveness of our model to learn class ties. Our model outperforms the baselines significantly, achieving state-of-the-art performance.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Connections between relations in relation extraction, which we call class ties, are common. background 1.00 0.09 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 In distantly supervised scenario, one entity tuple may have multiple relation facts. background 1.00 0.09 0.02 hedged possibility 0.86
s2 Exploiting class ties between relations of one entity tuple will be promising for distantly supervised relation extraction. background 0.91 0.09 0.12 hedged possibility 0.92
s3 However, previous models are not effective or ignore to model this property. gap 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 In this work, to effectively leverage class ties, we propose to make joint relation extraction with a unified model that integrates convolutional neural network (CNN) with a general pairwise ranking framework, in which three novel ranking loss functions are introduced. method 0.71 0.92 0.10 asserted 0.97
s5 Additionally, an effective method is presented to relieve the severe class imbalance problem from NR (not relation) for model training. method 0.62 0.89 0.03 asserted 0.98
s6 Experiments on a widely used dataset show that leveraging class ties will enhance extraction and demonstrate the effectiveness of our model to learn class ties. result 0.95 0.94 0.31 asserted 1.00
s7 Our model outperforms the baselines significantly, achieving state-of-the-art performance. result 1.00 0.95 0.64 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Connections between relations in relation extraction, which we call class ties, are common. In distantly supervised scenario, one entity tuple may have multiple relation facts. Exploiting class ties between relations of one entity tuple will be promising for distantly supervised relation extraction. However, previous models are not effective or ignore to model this property. In this work, to effectively leverage class ties, we propose to make joint relation extraction with a unified model that integrates convolutional neural network (CNN) with a general pairwise ranking framework, in which three novel ranking loss functions are introduced. Additionally, an effective method is presented to relieve the severe class imbalance problem from NR (not relation) for model training. Experiments on a widely used dataset show that leveraging class ties will enhance extraction and demonstrate the effectiveness of our model to learn class ties. Our model outperforms the baselines significantly, achieving state-of-the-art performance.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • At the algorithm level, for most existing relation extraction models [ref] , the input to the model is a raw sentence with two marked mentions, and the output is whether a relation holds between the two mentions.

    Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering · Introduction · 0.98

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.