Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hyperon polarization in Heavy-Ion Collisions and gravity-related anomaly

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1701.00923 v3 pith:XZU6TVFL submitted 2017-01-04 nucl-th hep-lathep-ph

classification nucl-thhep-lathep-ph
keywords polarizationanomalycollisionsearliereffectfoundhyperonsrelated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We study the energy dependence of global polarization of $\Lambda$ hyperons in peripheral $Au-Au$ collisions. We combine the calculation of vorticity and strange chemical potential in the framework of kinetic Quark-Gluon String Model with the anomalous mechanism related to axial vortical effect. The earlier found effect of helicity separation implies the quadrupole structure of longitudinal vorticity. We pay special attention to the temperature dependent contribution related to gravitational anomaly and found that the preliminary RHIC data are compatible with its suppression discovered earlier in lattice calculations. The antihyperons polarization is excessing that of hyperons and the difference is more pronounced at smaller energies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Global polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ hyperons in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC

    nucl-ex 2019-09 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Global polarization of Lambda and anti-Lambda hyperons in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 and 5.02 TeV is consistent with zero, with an average of about 0.01 percent plus or minus 0.06 percent statistical uncertainty.

Pith tools