Pith. Sign in

RECORD

VLT/FORS2 comparative transmission spectroscopy II: confirmation of a cloud-deck and Rayleigh scattering in WASP-31b, but no potassium?

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics · Submitted 7 Feb 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim However, our FORS2 observations appear to rule out the large potassium feature previously detected using STIS, yet it is recovered from the HST/STIS data, although with reduced amplitude and significance ($\approx$2.5$\sigma$).

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.86 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1702.02150 (version 1)
Pith IDLETPEJRX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavid K. Sing, Joanna K. Barstow, Neale P. Gibson, Nikolay Nikolov, Paul A. Wilson, Thomas M. Evans, Tiffany Kataria. "VLT/FORS2 comparative transmission spectroscopy II: confirmation of a cloud-deck and Rayleigh scattering in WASP-31b, but no potassium?." arXiv:1702.02150 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/LETPEJRX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,765 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.96 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.11 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present transmission spectroscopy of the hot-Jupiter WASP-31b using FORS2 on the VLT during two primary transits. The observations cover a wavelength range of $\approx$400-840nm. The light curves are corrupted by significant systematics, but these were to first order invariant with wavelength and could be removed using a common-mode correction derived from the white light curves. We reach a precision in the transit depth of $\approx$140 ppm in 15 nm bins, although the precision varies significantly over the wavelength range. Our FORS2 observations confirm the cloud-deck previously inferred using HST/STIS. We also re-analyse the HST/STIS data using a Gaussian process model, finding excellent agreement with earlier measurements. We reproduce the Rayleigh scattering signature at short wavelengths ($\lesssim$5300 $\AA$) and the cloud-deck at longer wavelengths. However, our FORS2 observations appear to rule out the large potassium feature previously detected using STIS, yet it is recovered from the HST/STIS data, although with reduced amplitude and significance ($\approx$2.5$\sigma$). The discrepancy between our results and the earlier STIS detection of potassium ($\approx$4.3$\sigma$) is either a result of telluric contamination of the ground-based observations, or an underestimate of the uncertainties for narrow-band features in HST/STIS when using linear basis models to account for the systematics. Our results further demonstrate the use of ground-based multi-object spectrographs for the study of exoplanet atmospheres, and highlight the need for caution in our interpretation of narrow-band features in low-resolution spectra of hot-Jupiters.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present transmission spectroscopy of the hot-Jupiter WASP-31b using FORS2 on the VLT during two primary transits. contribution 0.69 0.97 0.03 asserted 0.98
s1 The observations cover a wavelength range of $\approx$400-840nm. method 0.99 0.88 0.01 asserted 1.00
s2 The light curves are corrupted by significant systematics, but these were to first order invariant with wavelength and could be removed using a common-mode correction derived from the white light curves. method 0.76 0.91 0.02 asserted 0.79
s3 We reach a precision in the transit depth of $\approx$140 ppm in 15 nm bins, although the precision varies significantly over the wavelength range. result 0.90 0.96 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 Our FORS2 observations confirm the cloud-deck previously inferred using HST/STIS. result 1.00 0.90 0.23 asserted 1.00
s5 We also re-analyse the HST/STIS data using a Gaussian process model, finding excellent agreement with earlier measurements. result 0.40 0.95 0.05 asserted 1.00
s6 We reproduce the Rayleigh scattering signature at short wavelengths ($\lesssim$5300 $\AA$) and the cloud-deck at longer wavelengths. result 0.99 0.93 0.25 asserted 1.00
s7 However, our FORS2 observations appear to rule out the large potassium feature previously detected using STIS, yet it is recovered from the HST/STIS data, although with reduced amplitude and significance ($\approx$2.5$\sigma$). result 1.00 0.89 0.49 hedged possibility 0.86
s8 The discrepancy between our results and the earlier STIS detection of potassium ($\approx$4.3$\sigma$) is either a result of telluric contamination of the ground-based observations, or an underestimate of the uncertainties for narrow-band features in HST/STIS when using linear basis models to account for the systematics. interpretation 0.99 0.47 0.17 hedged possibility 0.92
s9 Our results further demonstrate the use of ground-based multi-object spectrographs for the study of exoplanet atmospheres, and highlight the need for caution in our interpretation of narrow-band features in low-resolution spectra of hot-Jupiters. interpretation 0.89 0.51 0.19 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present transmission spectroscopy of the hot-Jupiter WASP-31b using FORS2 on the VLT during two primary transits. The observations cover a wavelength range of $\approx$400-840nm. The light curves are corrupted by significant systematics, but these were to first order invariant with wavelength and could be removed using a common-mode correction derived from the white light curves. We reach a precision in the transit depth of $\approx$140 ppm in 15 nm bins, although the precision varies significantly over the wavelength range. Our FORS2 observations confirm the cloud-deck previously inferred using HST/STIS. We also re-analyse the HST/STIS data using a Gaussian process model, finding excellent agreement with earlier measurements. We reproduce the Rayleigh scattering signature at short wavelengths ($\lesssim$5300 $\AA$) and the cloud-deck at longer wavelengths. However, our FORS2 observations appear to rule out the large potassium feature previously detected using STIS, yet it is recovered from the HST/STIS data, although with reduced amplitude and significance ($\approx$2.5$\sigma$). The discrepancy between our results and the earlier STIS detection of potassium ($\approx$4.3$\sigma$) is either a result of telluric contamination of the ground-based observations, or an underestimate of the uncertainties for narrow-band features in HST/STIS when using linear basis models to account for the systematics. Our results further demonstrate the use of ground-based multi-object spectrographs for the study of exoplanet atmospheres, and highlight the need for caution in our interpretation of narrow-band features in low-resolution spectra of hot-Jupiters.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

What it cites

Cites as background 1 paper
  • Space-based observations have led the way in our understanding of exoplanet atmospheres [ref] , however ground-based observations are rapidly increasing in importance, with the adoption of multi-object spectrographs (MOS) to perform differential spectro-photometry [ref] .

    Rayleigh scattering in the transmission spectrum of HAT-P-18b · Introduction · 0.93

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.