Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1703.00056 v1 pith:RKJOYCMY submitted 2017-02-28 stat.AP cs.CYstat.ML

Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments

classification stat.AP cs.CYstat.ML
keywords predictionrecidivisminstrumentsacrossbiascontroversycriteriadisparate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recidivism prediction instruments (RPI's) provide decision makers with an assessment of the likelihood that a criminal defendant will reoffend at a future point in time. While such instruments are gaining increasing popularity across the country, their use is attracting tremendous controversy. Much of the controversy concerns potential discriminatory bias in the risk assessments that are produced. This paper discusses several fairness criteria that have recently been applied to assess the fairness of recidivism prediction instruments. We demonstrate that the criteria cannot all be simultaneously satisfied when recidivism prevalence differs across groups. We then show how disparate impact can arise when a recidivism prediction instrument fails to satisfy the criterion of error rate balance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FairBED: A Bayesian Experimental Design Approach to Gathering Fairer Data

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FairBED quantifies dataset fairness as uninformative about sensitive attributes and uses fairness-aware BED to gather data yielding better fairness-accuracy trade-offs than random or standard BED acquisition.

  2. Toward Calibrated, Fair, and accurate Deepfake Detection

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Face-Feature Tuning is a label-free logit remapping method that reduces FPR/TPR gaps across groups in deepfake detection while preserving overall accuracy.

  3. AgentFairBench: Do LLM Agents Discriminate When They Act?

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AgentFairBench is a multi-domain benchmark for demographic disparity in LLM agent actions, with a pilot showing no significant effect for Claude Haiku 4.5 after arity-matched noise correction.

  4. An Introduction to Causal Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Proposes causal reinforcement learning (CRL) as a framework that decomposes RL environments into structural causal models to unify online, off-policy, and causal learning while defining new tasks including generalized...