Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SemEval 2017 Task 10: ScienceIE - Extracting Keyphrases and Relations from Scientific Publications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1704.02853 v3 pith:BMN6F7X6 submitted 2017-04-10 cs.CL cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.CLcs.AIstat.ML
keywords taskscientificdescribeextractingkeyphrasespublicationsrelationssemeval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We describe the SemEval task of extracting keyphrases and relations between them from scientific documents, which is crucial for understanding which publications describe which processes, tasks and materials. Although this was a new task, we had a total of 26 submissions across 3 evaluation scenarios. We expect the task and the findings reported in this paper to be relevant for researchers working on understanding scientific content, as well as the broader knowledge base population and information extraction communities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring LLM Capabilities in Extracting DCAT-Compatible Metadata for Data Cataloging

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Large language models can generate DCAT-compatible metadata for data catalogs at quality close to human annotations, though the strongest evidence is for simple extraction tasks.

  2. An Optimized Pipeline for Automatic Educational Knowledge Graph Construction

    cs.CY 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Optimizing an EduKG pipeline with local Wikipedia dumps, better text extraction, disambiguation, and pruning lifts accuracy from 0.40 to 0.47 and cuts processing time by 10-100x.

Pith tools