REVIEW 1 cited by
Good Semi-supervised Learning that Requires a Bad GAN
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Semi-supervised learning methods based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) obtained strong empirical results, but it is not clear 1) how the discriminator benefits from joint training with a generator, and 2) why good semi-supervised classification performance and a good generator cannot be obtained at the same time. Theoretically, we show that given the discriminator objective, good semisupervised learning indeed requires a bad generator, and propose the definition of a preferred generator. Empirically, we derive a novel formulation based on our analysis that substantially improves over feature matching GANs, obtaining state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmark datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning
TabNet uses sequential attention with sparsemax masks for instance-wise feature selection and reports state-of-the-art results on several tabular classification and regression benchmarks, plus a masked-reconstruction ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.