Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Good Semi-supervised Learning that Requires a Bad GAN

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.09783 v3 pith:AJ3FOJTH submitted 2017-05-27 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords generatorgoodlearningsemi-superviseddiscriminatorgansobtainedrequires
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Semi-supervised learning methods based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) obtained strong empirical results, but it is not clear 1) how the discriminator benefits from joint training with a generator, and 2) why good semi-supervised classification performance and a good generator cannot be obtained at the same time. Theoretically, we show that given the discriminator objective, good semisupervised learning indeed requires a bad generator, and propose the definition of a preferred generator. Empirically, we derive a novel formulation based on our analysis that substantially improves over feature matching GANs, obtaining state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmark datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TabNet uses sequential attention with sparsemax masks for instance-wise feature selection and reports state-of-the-art results on several tabular classification and regression benchmarks, plus a masked-reconstruction ...

Pith tools