REVIEW 1 cited by
Supergeometry of $\Pi$-Projective Spaces
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper we prove that $\Pi$-projective spaces $\mathbb{P}^n_\Pi$ arise naturally in supergeometry upon considering a non-projected thickening of $\mathbb{P}^n$ related to the cotangent sheaf $\Omega^1_{\mathbb{P}^n}$. In particular, we prove that for $n \geq 2$ the $\Pi$-projective space $\mathbb{P}^n_\Pi$ can be constructed as the non-projected supermanifold determined by three elements $(\mathbb{P}^n, \Omega^1_{\mathbb{P}^n}, \lambda)$, where $\mathbb{P}^n$ is the ordinary complex projective space, $\Omega^1_{\mathbb{P}^n}$ is its cotangent sheaf and $\lambda $ is a non-zero complex number, representative of the fundamental obstruction class $\omega \in H^1 (\mathcal{T}_{\mathbb{P}^n} \otimes \bigwedge^2 \Omega^1_{\mathbb{P}^n}) \cong \mathbb{C}.$ Likewise, in the case $n=1$ the $\Pi$-projective line $\mathbb{P}^1_\Pi$ is the split supermanifold determined by the pair $(\mathbb{P}^1, \Omega^1_{\mathbb{P}^1} \cong \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1} (-2)).$ Moreover we show that in any dimension $\Pi$-projective spaces are Calabi-Yau supermanifolds. To conclude, we offer pieces of evidence that, more in general, also $\Pi$-Grassmannians can be constructed the same way using the cotangent sheaf of their underlying reduced Grassmannians, provided that also higher, possibly fermionic, obstruction classes are taken into account. This suggests that this unexpected connection with the cotangent sheaf is characteristic of $\Pi$-geometry.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beta-deformation in Twistor-String Theory
Ghost-number-two BRST states of the B-model on CP^{3|4} realize the beta deformation of N=4 super-Yang-Mills and deform the action by a current-current term.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.