Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

"Everything I Disagree With is #FakeNews": Correlating Political Polarization and Spread of Misinformation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1706.05924 v2 pith:AXWKPYVG submitted 2017-06-19 cs.SI cs.CY

classification cs.SIcs.CY
keywords fakepolarizationmisinformationnewsdisagreepoliticaltweetsurls
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

An important challenge in the process of tracking and detecting the dissemination of misinformation is to understand the political gap between people that engage with the so called "fake news". A possible factor responsible for this gap is opinion polarization, which may prompt the general public to classify content that they disagree or want to discredit as fake. In this work, we study the relationship between political polarization and content reported by Twitter users as related to "fake news". We investigate how polarization may create distinct narratives on what misinformation actually is. We perform our study based on two datasets collected from Twitter. The first dataset contains tweets about US politics in general, from which we compute the degree of polarization of each user towards the Republican and Democratic Party. In the second dataset, we collect tweets and URLs that co-occurred with "fake news" related keywords and hashtags, such as #FakeNews and #AlternativeFact, as well as reactions towards such tweets and URLs. We then analyze the relationship between polarization and what is perceived as misinformation, and whether users are designating information that they disagree as fake. Our results show an increase in the polarization of users and URLs associated with fake-news keywords and hashtags, when compared to information not labeled as "fake news". We discuss the impact of our findings on the challenges of tracking "fake news" in the ongoing battle against misinformation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. German parties shifted towards intuition-based rhetoric after the far right's parliamentary breakthrough

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    German elite discourse shifted toward intuition-based rhetoric between 2015 and 2025, with the sharpest drop in parliamentary language coinciding with the AfD's 2017 entry.

  2. Negative Ties Highlight Hidden Extremes in Social Media Polarization

    physics.soc-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Negative votes on Menéame expose ideologically extreme users, such as pro-Russia accounts, that positive-only embeddings fail to distinguish from ordinary left-wing users.

  3. A More Advanced Group Polarization Measurement Approach Based on LLM-Based Agents and Graphs

    cs.CY 2024-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Group polarization is measured through a Community Sentiment Network built by a team of LLM agents, with a Community Opposition Index score; only the stance detection step is empirically tested.

Pith tools