Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Personalization in Goal-Oriented Dialog

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1706.07503 v3 pith:OIVABIGC submitted 2017-06-22 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords dialogpersonalizationgoal-orientedend-to-endexistingmodelsprofilessystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The main goal of modeling human conversation is to create agents which can interact with people in both open-ended and goal-oriented scenarios. End-to-end trained neural dialog systems are an important line of research for such generalized dialog models as they do not resort to any situation-specific handcrafting of rules. However, incorporating personalization into such systems is a largely unexplored topic as there are no existing corpora to facilitate such work. In this paper, we present a new dataset of goal-oriented dialogs which are influenced by speaker profiles attached to them. We analyze the shortcomings of an existing end-to-end dialog system based on Memory Networks and propose modifications to the architecture which enable personalization. We also investigate personalization in dialog as a multi-task learning problem, and show that a single model which shares features among various profiles outperforms separate models for each profile.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PersonaLens: A Benchmark for Personalization Evaluation in Conversational AI Assistants

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PersonaLens uses LLM-simulated users and an LLM judge to evaluate personalization in task-oriented conversational assistants across 111 tasks and 20 domains.

Pith tools