Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Revisiting Quasiparticle Scattering Interference in High-Temperature Superconductors: The Problem of Narrow Peaks

Superconductivity · Submitted 11 Jul 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It appears that there is an unknown mechanism at work which renders the QPI peaks much sharper than they are based on present theoretical understanding.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.89 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1707.03362 (version 2)
Pith IDWFXQNVPF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJan Zaanen, Miguel Antonio Sulangi, Milan P. Allan. "Revisiting Quasiparticle Scattering Interference in High-Temperature Superconductors: The Problem of Narrow Peaks." arXiv:1707.03362 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/WFXQNVPF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,709 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.91 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.21 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.34 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We revisit the interpretation of quasiparticle scattering interference in cuprate high-$T_c$ superconductors. This phenomenon has been very successful in reconstructing the dispersions of d-wave Bogoliubov excitations, but the successful identification and interpretation of QPI in scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) experiments rely on theoretical results obtained for the case of isolated impurities. We introduce a highly flexible technique to simulate STS measurements by computing the local density of states using real-space Green's functions defined on two-dimensional lattices with as many as 100,000 sites. We focus on the following question: to what extent can the experimental results be reproduced when various forms of distributed disorder are present? We consider randomly distributed point-like impurities, smooth "Coulombic" disorder, and disorder arising from random on-site energies and superconducting gaps. We find an apparent paradox: the QPI peaks in the Fourier-transformed local density of states appear to be sharper and better defined in experiment than those seen in our simulations. We arrive at a no-go result for smooth-potential disorder since this does not reproduce the QPI peaks associated with large-momentum scattering. An ensemble of point-like impurities gets closest to experiment, but this goes hand in hand with impurity cores that are not seen in experiment. We also study the effects of possible measurement artifacts (the "fork mechanism"), which turn out to be of relatively minor consequence. It appears that there is an unknown mechanism at work which renders the QPI peaks much sharper than they are based on present theoretical understanding.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We revisit the interpretation of quasiparticle scattering interference in cuprate high-$T_c$ superconductors. background 0.55 0.67 0.02 unclear 0.59
s1 This phenomenon has been very successful in reconstructing the dispersions of d-wave Bogoliubov excitations, but the successful identification and interpretation of QPI in scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) experiments rely on theoretical results obtained for the case of isolated impurities. background 0.93 0.07 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 We introduce a highly flexible technique to simulate STS measurements by computing the local density of states using real-space Green's functions defined on two-dimensional lattices with as many as 100,000 sites. method 0.97 0.94 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 We focus on the following question: to what extent can the experimental results be reproduced when various forms of distributed disorder are present? contribution 0.78 0.38 0.03 unclear 0.95
s4 We consider randomly distributed point-like impurities, smooth "Coulombic" disorder, and disorder arising from random on-site energies and superconducting gaps. method 0.53 0.78 0.02 asserted 0.82
s5 We find an apparent paradox: the QPI peaks in the Fourier-transformed local density of states appear to be sharper and better defined in experiment than those seen in our simulations. result 1.00 0.94 0.17 asserted 0.78
s6 We arrive at a no-go result for smooth-potential disorder since this does not reproduce the QPI peaks associated with large-momentum scattering. result 1.00 0.92 0.11 asserted 1.00
s7 An ensemble of point-like impurities gets closest to experiment, but this goes hand in hand with impurity cores that are not seen in experiment. result 0.97 0.93 0.12 asserted 0.96
s8 We also study the effects of possible measurement artifacts (the "fork mechanism"), which turn out to be of relatively minor consequence. result 0.97 0.92 0.03 asserted 0.98
s9 It appears that there is an unknown mechanism at work which renders the QPI peaks much sharper than they are based on present theoretical understanding. interpretation 0.96 0.70 0.85 hedged possibility 0.89

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We revisit the interpretation of quasiparticle scattering interference in cuprate high-$T_c$ superconductors. This phenomenon has been very successful in reconstructing the dispersions of d-wave Bogoliubov excitations, but the successful identification and interpretation of QPI in scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) experiments rely on theoretical results obtained for the case of isolated impurities. We introduce a highly flexible technique to simulate STS measurements by computing the local density of states using real-space Green's functions defined on two-dimensional lattices with as many as 100,000 sites. We focus on the following question: to what extent can the experimental results be reproduced when various forms of distributed disorder are present? We consider randomly distributed point-like impurities, smooth "Coulombic" disorder, and disorder arising from random on-site energies and superconducting gaps. We find an apparent paradox: the QPI peaks in the Fourier-transformed local density of states appear to be sharper and better defined in experiment than those seen in our simulations. We arrive at a no-go result for smooth-potential disorder since this does not reproduce the QPI peaks associated with large-momentum scattering. An ensemble of point-like impurities gets closest to experiment, but this goes hand in hand with impurity cores that are not seen in experiment. We also study the effects of possible measurement artifacts (the "fork mechanism"), which turn out to be of relatively minor consequence. It appears that there is an unknown mechanism at work which renders the QPI peaks much sharper than they are based on present theoretical understanding.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.