Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.05924 v1 pith:OUT37ON4 submitted 2017-07-19 math.ST stat.TH

Robustness of semiparametric efficiency in nearly-true models for two-phase samples

classification math.ST stat.TH
keywords modelefficientestimatormisspecificationmodelstwo-phaseaipwcorrectly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We examine the performance of efficient and AIPW estimators under two-phase sampling when the complete-data model is nearly correctly specified, in the sense that the misspecification is not reliably detectable from the data by any possible diagnostic or test. Asymptotic results for these nearly true models are obtained by representing them as sequences of misspecified models that are mutually contiguous with a correctly specified model. We find that for the least-favourable direction of model misspecification the bias in the efficient estimator induced can be comparable to the extra variability in the AIPW estimator, so that the mean squared error of the efficient estimator is no longer lower. This can happen when the most-powerful test for the model misspecification still has modest power. We verify that the theoretical results agree with simulation in three examples: a simple informative-sampling model for a Normal mean, logistic regression in the classical case-control design, and linear regression in a two-phase design.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Methods to address measurement error in both Outcome and Covariates

    stat.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Tutorial reviewing and comparing methods to correct measurement error in outcomes and multiple covariates, with a running example, data, and code for reproduction.