Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bounds on absolutely maximally entangled states from shadow inequalities, and the quantum MacWilliams identity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.06298 v2 pith:B6GI4D2N submitted 2017-08-21 quant-ph cs.ITmath.IT

classification quant-phcs.ITmath.IT
keywords quantumstatesmaximallyabsolutelyacrossbipartitionboundsdimensions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A pure multipartite quantum state is called absolutely maximally entangled (AME), if all reductions obtained by tracing out at least half of its parties are maximally mixed. Maximal entanglement is then present across every bipartition. The existence of such states is in many cases unclear. With the help of the weight enumerator machinery known from quantum error correction and the generalized shadow inequalities, we obtain new bounds on the existence of AME states in dimensions larger than two. To complete the treatment on the weight enumerator machinery, the quantum MacWilliams identity is derived in the Bloch representation. Finally, we consider AME states whose subsystems have different local dimensions, and present an example for a $2 \times3 \times 3 \times 3$ system that shows maximal entanglement across every bipartition.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symmetry-guided constructions of absolutely maximally entangled states in five open cases

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New explicit Hermitian self-dual MDS codes yield AME(12,5), AME(18,11), AME(18,13), and their 17-party projections.

Pith tools