Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An Empirical Evaluation of Rule Extraction from Recurrent Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.10380 v5 pith:SIJXF5H3 submitted 2017-09-29 cs.LG

An Empirical Evaluation of Rule Extraction from Recurrent Neural Networks

classification cs.LG
keywords extractionnetworksneuralrecurrentrnnsrulestrainedmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Rule extraction from black-box models is critical in domains that require model validation before implementation, as can be the case in credit scoring and medical diagnosis. Though already a challenging problem in statistical learning in general, the difficulty is even greater when highly non-linear, recursive models, such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs), are fit to data. Here, we study the extraction of rules from second-order recurrent neural networks trained to recognize the Tomita grammars. We show that production rules can be stably extracted from trained RNNs and that in certain cases the rules outperform the trained RNNs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.