Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

User-friendly guarantees for the Langevin Monte Carlo with inaccurate gradient

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1710.00095 v4 pith:XQSP23YP submitted 2017-09-29 math.ST cs.LGmath.PRstat.COstat.MLstat.TH

classification math.STcs.LGmath.PRstat.COstat.MLstat.TH
keywords gradientguaranteeserrorsamplingfirst-orderimprovelangevinsecond-order
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the problem of sampling from a given probability density function that is known to be smooth and strongly log-concave. We analyze several methods of approximate sampling based on discretizations of the (highly overdamped) Langevin diffusion and establish guarantees on its error measured in the Wasserstein-2 distance. Our guarantees improve or extend the state-of-the-art results in three directions. First, we provide an upper bound on the error of the first-order Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) algorithm with optimized varying step-size. This result has the advantage of being horizon free (we do not need to know in advance the target precision) and to improve by a logarithmic factor the corresponding result for the constant step-size. Second, we study the case where accurate evaluations of the gradient of the log-density are unavailable, but one can have access to approximations of the aforementioned gradient. In such a situation, we consider both deterministic and stochastic approximations of the gradient and provide an upper bound on the sampling error of the first-order LMC that quantifies the impact of the gradient evaluation inaccuracies. Third, we establish upper bounds for two versions of the second-order LMC, which leverage the Hessian of the log-density. We provide nonasymptotic guarantees on the sampling error of these second-order LMCs. These guarantees reveal that the second-order LMC algorithms improve on the first-order LMC in ill-conditioned settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generalization of Gibbs and Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms in the Interpolation Regime

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New PAC-Bayes bounds for the Gibbs posterior remain non-vacuous in the interpolation regime and can be approximated by Langevin Monte Carlo, but the tight experimental numbers rely on an unproved random-label calibrat...

  2. Sampling from Boltzmann densities with physics informed low-rank formats

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A low-rank tensor-train solver for the continuity equation along an annealing path, combined with resampling and Langevin steps, samples Boltzmann densities with low energy distance on benchmarks.

Pith tools