Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Tidal Dissipation in WASP-12

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1710.00858 v1 pith:LVNPA433 submitted 2017-10-02 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords simeqstartidaldissipationorbitaltextrmdecaymain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

WASP-12 is a hot Jupiter system with an orbital period of $P= 1.1\textrm{ day}$, making it one of the shortest-period giant planets known. Recent transit timing observations by Maciejewski et al. (2016) and Patra et al. (2017) find a decreasing period with $P/|\dot{P}| = 3.2\textrm{ Myr}$. This has been interpreted as evidence of either orbital decay due to tidal dissipation or a long term oscillation of the apparent period due to apsidal precession. Here we consider the possibility that it is orbital decay. We show that the parameters of the host star are consistent with either a $M_\ast \simeq 1.3 M_\odot$ main sequence star or a $M_\ast \simeq 1.2 M_\odot$ subgiant. We find that if the star is on the main sequence, the tidal dissipation is too inefficient to explain the observed $\dot{P}$. However, if it is a subgiant, the tidal dissipation is significantly enhanced due to nonlinear wave breaking of the dynamical tide near the star's center. The subgiant models have a tidal quality factor $Q_\ast'\simeq 2\times10^5$ and an orbital decay rate that agrees well with the observed $\dot{P}$. It would also explain why the planet survived for $\simeq 3\textrm{ Gyr}$ while the star was on the main sequence and yet is now inspiraling on a 3 Myr timescale. Although this suggests that we are witnessing the last $\sim 0.1\%$ of the planet's life, the probability of such a detection is a few percent given the observed sample of $\simeq 30$ hot Jupiters in $P<3\textrm{ day}$ orbits around $M_\ast>1.2 M_\odot$ hosts.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Observing a 542-day transiting giant with large TTVs: The 2025 transit of HIP 41378 f and new constraints on the outer system

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    New 2025 transit timing of HIP 41378 f shows a 7-hour early arrival consistent with TTVs; N-body modeling with TRADES refines ephemerides for planets d, e, and f.

  2. Observing a 542-day transiting giant with large TTVs: The 2025 transit of HIP 41378 f and new constraints on the outer system

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    New 2025 transit timing for HIP 41378 f confirms large TTVs and is combined with prior data on planets d and e in an N-body model to update ephemerides and predict future transits.

Pith tools