REVIEW 1 cited by
N-Jettiness Subtractions for $gg\to H$ at Subleading Power
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
$N$-jettiness subtractions provide a general approach for performing fully-differential next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) calculations. Since they are based on the physical resolution variable $N$-jettiness, $\mathcal{T}_N$, subleading power corrections in $\tau=\mathcal{T}_N/Q$, with $Q$ a hard interaction scale, can also be systematically computed. We study the structure of power corrections for $0$-jettiness, $\mathcal{T}_0$, for the $gg\to H$ process. Using the soft-collinear effective theory we analytically compute the leading power corrections $\alpha_s \tau \ln\tau$ and $\alpha_s^2 \tau \ln^3\tau$ (finding partial agreement with a previous result in the literature), and perform a detailed numerical study of the power corrections in the $gg$, $gq$, and $q\bar q$ channels. This includes a numerical extraction of the $\alpha_s\tau$ and $\alpha_s^2 \tau \ln^2\tau$ corrections, and a study of the dependence on the $\mathcal{T}_0$ definition. Including such power suppressed logarithms significantly reduces the size of missing power corrections, and hence improves the numerical efficiency of the subtraction method. Having a more detailed understanding of the power corrections for both $q\bar q$ and $gg$ initiated processes also provides insight into their universality, and hence their behavior in more complicated processes where they have not yet been analytically calculated.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Precision $e^+e^-$ Hemisphere Masses in the Dijet Region with Power Corrections
N3LL' resummation for heavy jet and dihemisphere masses in the dijet region, with a new claim that heavy jet mass moments require an extra non-perturbative parameter at order 1/Q.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.