Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Blind Image Fusion for Hyperspectral Imaging with the Directional Total Variation

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 4 Oct 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Numerical results on real remote sensing data from plant sciences and urban monitoring show the potential of the proposed method and suggests that it is robust with respect to the regularization parameters, mis-registration and the shape of the kernel.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.89 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1710.05705 (version 4)
Pith ID7PS4UU6B, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCarola-Bibiane Sch\"onlieb, David A. Coomes, Jennifer Rasch, Leon Bungert, Matthias J. Ehrhardt, Rafael Reisenhofer. "Blind Image Fusion for Hyperspectral Imaging with the Directional Total Variation." arXiv:1710.05705 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/7PS4UU6B
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,233 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.44 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Hyperspectral imaging is a cutting-edge type of remote sensing used for mapping vegetation properties, rock minerals and other materials. A major drawback of hyperspectral imaging devices is their intrinsic low spatial resolution. In this paper, we propose a method for increasing the spatial resolution of a hyperspectral image by fusing it with an image of higher spatial resolution that was obtained with a different imaging modality. This is accomplished by solving a variational problem in which the regularization functional is the directional total variation. To accommodate for possible mis-registrations between the two images, we consider a non-convex blind super-resolution problem where both a fused image and the corresponding convolution kernel are estimated. Using this approach, our model can realign the given images if needed. Our experimental results indicate that the non-convexity is negligible in practice and that reliable solutions can be computed using a variety of different optimization algorithms. Numerical results on real remote sensing data from plant sciences and urban monitoring show the potential of the proposed method and suggests that it is robust with respect to the regularization parameters, mis-registration and the shape of the kernel.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Hyperspectral imaging is a cutting-edge type of remote sensing used for mapping vegetation properties, rock minerals and other materials. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 A major drawback of hyperspectral imaging devices is their intrinsic low spatial resolution. background 0.92 0.07 0.01 asserted 1.00
s2 In this paper, we propose a method for increasing the spatial resolution of a hyperspectral image by fusing it with an image of higher spatial resolution that was obtained with a different imaging modality. contribution 0.99 0.75 0.11 asserted 0.98
s3 This is accomplished by solving a variational problem in which the regularization functional is the directional total variation. method 0.99 0.84 0.05 asserted 1.00
s4 To accommodate for possible mis-registrations between the two images, we consider a non-convex blind super-resolution problem where both a fused image and the corresponding convolution kernel are estimated. method 0.92 0.83 0.04 asserted 0.90
s5 Using this approach, our model can realign the given images if needed. method 0.59 0.67 0.06 asserted 0.52
s6 Our experimental results indicate that the non-convexity is negligible in practice and that reliable solutions can be computed using a variety of different optimization algorithms. result 0.87 0.95 0.25 hedged possibility 0.63
s7 Numerical results on real remote sensing data from plant sciences and urban monitoring show the potential of the proposed method and suggests that it is robust with respect to the regularization parameters, mis-registration and the shape of the kernel. result 0.73 0.96 0.64 hedged possibility 0.89

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.45.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Hyperspectral imaging is a cutting-edge type of remote sensing used for mapping vegetation properties, rock minerals and other materials. A major drawback of hyperspectral imaging devices is their intrinsic low spatial resolution. In this paper, we propose a method for increasing the spatial resolution of a hyperspectral image by fusing it with an image of higher spatial resolution that was obtained with a different imaging modality. This is accomplished by solving a variational problem in which the regularization functional is the directional total variation. To accommodate for possible mis-registrations between the two images, we consider a non-convex blind super-resolution problem where both a fused image and the corresponding convolution kernel are estimated. Using this approach, our model can realign the given images if needed. Our experimental results indicate that the non-convexity is negligible in practice and that reliable solutions can be computed using a variety of different optimization algorithms. Numerical results on real remote sensing data from plant sciences and urban monitoring show the potential of the proposed method and suggests that it is robust with respect to the regularization parameters, mis-registration and the shape of the kernel.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • A potential solution to avoid such issues is the infimal convolution of Bregman distances, in this cases with the two normal fields and thus subgradients of opposite sign (cf. [ref] ) [equation] We also mention some other related approaches to modify total variation functionals such as the parallel level set models (cf. [ref] ), which can be related to the Bregman distance for total variation (cf. [ref] ), or directional / structural total variation (cf. [ref] ), formally [equation]

    Modern Regularization Methods for Inverse Problems · Bregman Distances · 0.83

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
  • This naturally leads to the directional total generalized variation which combines higher order smoothness with structural a-priori knowledge as presented in this work, thereby generalizing the definition of [ref] .

    Directional Total Generalized Variation Regularization · Conclusions and Outlook · 0.98

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.