RECORD
Intercalating cobalt between graphene and iridium (111): a spatially-dependent kinetics from the edges
Materials Science · Submitted 30 Oct 2017
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Our measurements reveal that the edges of a graphene flake represent an energy barrier to intercalation.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Using low-energy electron microscopy, we image in real time the intercalation of a cobalt monolayer between graphene and the (111) surface of iridium. Our measurements reveal that the edges of a graphene flake represent an energy barrier to intercalation. Based on a simple description of the growth kinetics, we estimate this energy barrier and find small, but substantial, local variations. These local variations suggest a possible influence of the graphene orientation with respect to its substrate and of the graphene edge termination on the energy value of the barrier height. Besides, our measurements show that intercalated cobalt is energetically more favorable than cobalt on bare iridium, indicating a surfactant role of graphene.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Using low-energy electron microscopy, we image in real time the intercalation of a cobalt monolayer between graphene and the (111) surface of iridium. | method 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.04 | asserted 0.99 |
| s1 | Our measurements reveal that the edges of a graphene flake represent an energy barrier to intercalation. | result 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.54 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Based on a simple description of the growth kinetics, we estimate this energy barrier and find small, but substantial, local variations. | result 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.14 | asserted 0.99 |
| s3 | These local variations suggest a possible influence of the graphene orientation with respect to its substrate and of the graphene edge termination on the energy value of the barrier height. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.17 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
| s4 | Besides, our measurements show that intercalated cobalt is energetically more favorable than cobalt on bare iridium, indicating a surfactant role of graphene. | result 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.24 | asserted 0.76 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Using low-energy electron microscopy, we image in real time the intercalation of a cobalt monolayer between graphene and the (111) surface of iridium. Our measurements reveal that the edges of a graphene flake represent an energy barrier to intercalation. Based on a simple description of the growth kinetics, we estimate this energy barrier and find small, but substantial, local variations. These local variations suggest a possible influence of the graphene orientation with respect to its substrate and of the graphene edge termination on the energy value of the barrier height. Besides, our measurements show that intercalated cobalt is energetically more favorable than cobalt on bare iridium, indicating a surfactant role of graphene.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.