RECORD
Beyond the 2-Body Interaction Paradigm: The Case for Extended A-Body Pairing Interaction in Nuclei
Nuclear Theory · Submitted 23 Dec 2017
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim These three cases present evidence for the need of better understanding of the three-nucleon (NNN), four-nucleon (NNNN), and A-body interactions in nuclei either derived from ChPT or from a phenomenological considerations.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We discuss modeling of nuclear structure beyond the 2-body interaction paradigm. Our first example is related to the need of three nucleon contact interaction terms suggested by chiral perturbation theory. The relationship of the two low-energy effective coupling parameters for the relevant three nucleon contact interaction terms $c_D$ and $c_E$ that reproduce the binding energy of $^3$H and $^3$He has been emphasized and the physically relevant parameter region has been illustrated using the binding energy of $^4$He. Further justification of A-body interaction terms is outlined based on the Okubo-Lee-Suzuki effective interaction method used in solving the nuclear many-body problem within a finite model space. The third example we use is an exactly solvable A-body extended pairing interaction applied to heavy nuclei with a long isotopic chains, in particular using $^{132}$Sn and $^{208}$Pb as closed core system illustrates a remarkable relationship between the extended pairing strength $G(A)$ and the size of the valence space $\dim(A)$ for the members of these two isotope chain: $G(A)=\alpha\dim(A)^{-\beta}$ with $\alpha=259.436$ for Sn and $\alpha=366.77$ for Pb while the parameter $\beta$ is practically 1. These three cases present evidence for the need of better understanding of the three-nucleon (NNN), four-nucleon (NNNN), and A-body interactions in nuclei either derived from ChPT or from a phenomenological considerations.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We discuss modeling of nuclear structure beyond the 2-body interaction paradigm. | contribution 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.09 | unclear 0.69 |
| s1 | Our first example is related to the need of three nucleon contact interaction terms suggested by chiral perturbation theory. | contribution 0.69 | 0.15 | 0.06 | hedged possibility 0.63 |
| s2 | The relationship of the two low-energy effective coupling parameters for the relevant three nucleon contact interaction terms $c_D$ and $c_E$ that reproduce the binding energy of $^3$H and $^3$He has been emphasized and the physically relevant parameter region has been illustrated using the binding energy of $^4$He. | result 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Further justification of A-body interaction terms is outlined based on the Okubo-Lee-Suzuki effective interaction method used in solving the nuclear many-body problem within a finite model space. | method 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.06 | asserted 0.84 |
| s4 | The third example we use is an exactly solvable A-body extended pairing interaction applied to heavy nuclei with a long isotopic chains, in particular using $^{132}$Sn and $^{208}$Pb as closed core system illustrates a remarkable relationship between the extended pairing strength $G(A)$ and the size of the valence space $\dim(A)$ for the members of these two isotope chain: $G(A)=\alpha\dim(A)^{-\beta}$ with $\alpha=259.436$ for Sn and $\alpha=366.77$ for Pb while the parameter $\beta$ is practically 1. | result 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | These three cases present evidence for the need of better understanding of the three-nucleon (NNN), four-nucleon (NNNN), and A-body interactions in nuclei either derived from ChPT or from a phenomenological considerations. | interpretation 0.93 | 0.42 | 0.82 | asserted 0.74 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We discuss modeling of nuclear structure beyond the 2-body interaction paradigm. Our first example is related to the need of three nucleon contact interaction terms suggested by chiral perturbation theory. The relationship of the two low-energy effective coupling parameters for the relevant three nucleon contact interaction terms $c_D$ and $c_E$ that reproduce the binding energy of $^3$H and $^3$He has been emphasized and the physically relevant parameter region has been illustrated using the binding energy of $^4$He. Further justification of A-body interaction terms is outlined based on the Okubo-Lee-Suzuki effective interaction method used in solving the nuclear many-body problem within a finite model space. The third example we use is an exactly solvable A-body extended pairing interaction applied to heavy nuclei with a long isotopic chains, in particular using $^{132}$Sn and $^{208}$Pb as closed core system illustrates a remarkable relationship between the extended pairing strength $G(A)$ and the size of the valence space $\dim(A)$ for the members of these two isotope chain: $G(A)=\alpha\dim(A)^{-\beta}$ with $\alpha=259.436$ for Sn and $\alpha=366.77$ for Pb while the parameter $\beta$ is practically 1. These three cases present evidence for the need of better understanding of the three-nucleon (NNN), four-nucleon (NNNN), and A-body interactions in nuclei either derived from ChPT or from a phenomenological considerations.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.