REVIEW 1 cited by
HACS: Human Action Clips and Segments Dataset for Recognition and Temporal Localization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents a new large-scale dataset for recognition and temporal localization of human actions collected from Web videos. We refer to it as HACS (Human Action Clips and Segments). We leverage both consensus and disagreement among visual classifiers to automatically mine candidate short clips from unlabeled videos, which are subsequently validated by human annotators. The resulting dataset is dubbed HACS Clips. Through a separate process we also collect annotations defining action segment boundaries. This resulting dataset is called HACS Segments. Overall, HACS Clips consists of 1.5M annotated clips sampled from 504K untrimmed videos, and HACS Seg-ments contains 139K action segments densely annotatedin 50K untrimmed videos spanning 200 action categories. HACS Clips contains more labeled examples than any existing video benchmark. This renders our dataset both a large scale action recognition benchmark and an excellent source for spatiotemporal feature learning. In our transferlearning experiments on three target datasets, HACS Clips outperforms Kinetics-600, Moments-In-Time and Sports1Mas a pretraining source. On HACS Segments, we evaluate state-of-the-art methods of action proposal generation and action localization, and highlight the new challenges posed by our dense temporal annotations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
VideoForest: Person-Anchored Hierarchical Reasoning for Cross-Video Question Answering
A person-anchored tree plus multi-agent LLM pipeline lets a system answer cross-video queries about the same person, and it beats single-video models on the authors' new CrossVideoQA benchmark.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.