Pith. Sign in

RECORD

New mass anchor points for neutron-deficient heavy nuclei from direct mass measurements of radium and actinium isotopes

Nuclear Experiment · Submitted 9 Jan 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The new direct mass measurements serve as an independent and direct benchmark for existing $\alpha$-$\gamma$ spectroscopy data in this mass region.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1801.02823 (version 4)
Pith IDZZSTOXTG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Ozawa, A. Takamine, D. Kaji, H. Haba, H. Koura, H. Miyatake, H. Wollnik, I. Murray, J. Y. Moon, K. Morimoto, K. Morita, M. MacCormick, M. Reponen, M. Rosenbusch, M. Wada, P. Schury, S. Kimura, T. Niwase, T. Tanaka, Y. Ito. "New mass anchor points for neutron-deficient heavy nuclei from direct mass measurements of radium and actinium isotopes." arXiv:1801.02823 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/ZZSTOXTG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,976 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.38 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.19 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.13 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The masses of the exotic isotopes $^{210-214}$Ac and $^{210-214}$Ra have been measured with a multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrograph. These isotopes were obtained in flight as fusion-evaporation products behind the gas-filled recoil ion separator GARIS-II at RIKEN. The new direct mass measurements serve as an independent and direct benchmark for existing $\alpha$-$\gamma$ spectroscopy data in this mass region. Further, new mass anchor points are set for U and Np nuclei close to the $N=126$ shell closure for a future benchmark of the $Z=92$ sub-shell for neutron-deficient heavy isotopes. Our mass results are in general in good agreement with the previously indirectly-determined mass values. Together with the measurement data, reasons for possible mass ambiguities from decay-data links between ground states are discussed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The masses of the exotic isotopes $^{210-214}$Ac and $^{210-214}$Ra have been measured with a multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrograph. contribution 0.69 0.96 0.07 asserted 1.00
s1 These isotopes were obtained in flight as fusion-evaporation products behind the gas-filled recoil ion separator GARIS-II at RIKEN. method 1.00 0.76 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 The new direct mass measurements serve as an independent and direct benchmark for existing $\alpha$-$\gamma$ spectroscopy data in this mass region. interpretation 0.89 0.81 0.29 asserted 1.00
s3 Further, new mass anchor points are set for U and Np nuclei close to the $N=126$ shell closure for a future benchmark of the $Z=92$ sub-shell for neutron-deficient heavy isotopes. interpretation 0.39 0.81 0.57 asserted 0.99
s4 Our mass results are in general in good agreement with the previously indirectly-determined mass values. result 0.84 0.81 0.15 asserted 0.85
s5 Together with the measurement data, reasons for possible mass ambiguities from decay-data links between ground states are discussed. interpretation 0.53 0.76 0.05 hedged possibility 0.46

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.94 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The masses of the exotic isotopes $^{210-214}$Ac and $^{210-214}$Ra have been measured with a multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrograph. These isotopes were obtained in flight as fusion-evaporation products behind the gas-filled recoil ion separator GARIS-II at RIKEN. The new direct mass measurements serve as an independent and direct benchmark for existing $\alpha$-$\gamma$ spectroscopy data in this mass region. Further, new mass anchor points are set for U and Np nuclei close to the $N=126$ shell closure for a future benchmark of the $Z=92$ sub-shell for neutron-deficient heavy isotopes. Our mass results are in general in good agreement with the previously indirectly-determined mass values. Together with the measurement data, reasons for possible mass ambiguities from decay-data links between ground states are discussed.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.