Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Aspects of Domain-Wall Standard Model

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 8 Jan 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We also propose a simple unified picture of localizing all the SM fields.

how it is stated · asserted 0.90 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1801.03007 (version 2)
Pith IDFSJBXAS6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDesmond Villalba, Digesh Raut, Nobuchika Okada. "Aspects of Domain-Wall Standard Model." arXiv:1801.03007 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/FSJBXAS6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,426 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.14 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We have recently proposed a setup of the "Domain-Wall Standard Model" in a non-compact 5-dimensional space-time, where all the Standard Model (SM) fields are localized in certain domains of the 5th dimension. While the SM is realized as a 4-dimensional effective theory at low energies, the model involves Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes of the SM particles. In this paper we introduce two simple solvable examples which lead to domain-wall configurations for the SM particles and their KK-modes. Based on the examples, we address a variety of phenomenologies of the Domain-Wall SM, such as the KK-mode gauge boson phenomenology at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the effect of the KK-mode SM fermions on Higgs boson phenomenology, and the KK-mode fermion search at the LHC with its decay into a corresponding SM fermion and a Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with a spontaneous breaking of the translational invariance in the 5th dimension. We also propose a simple unified picture of localizing all the SM fields.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We have recently proposed a setup of the "Domain-Wall Standard Model" in a non-compact 5-dimensional space-time, where all the Standard Model (SM) fields are localized in certain domains of the 5th dimension. background 0.83 0.71 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 While the SM is realized as a 4-dimensional effective theory at low energies, the model involves Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes of the SM particles. background 0.98 0.21 0.06 asserted 1.00
s2 In this paper we introduce two simple solvable examples which lead to domain-wall configurations for the SM particles and their KK-modes. contribution 0.87 0.91 0.11 asserted 1.00
s3 Based on the examples, we address a variety of phenomenologies of the Domain-Wall SM, such as the KK-mode gauge boson phenomenology at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the effect of the KK-mode SM fermions on Higgs boson phenomenology, and the KK-mode fermion search at the LHC with its decay into a corresponding SM fermion and a Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with a spontaneous breaking of the translational invariance in the 5th dimension. contribution 0.97 0.80 0.26 asserted 0.95
s4 We also propose a simple unified picture of localizing all the SM fields. contribution 1.00 0.88 0.21 asserted 0.90

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We have recently proposed a setup of the "Domain-Wall Standard Model" in a non-compact 5-dimensional space-time, where all the Standard Model (SM) fields are localized in certain domains of the 5th dimension. While the SM is realized as a 4-dimensional effective theory at low energies, the model involves Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes of the SM particles. In this paper we introduce two simple solvable examples which lead to domain-wall configurations for the SM particles and their KK-modes. Based on the examples, we address a variety of phenomenologies of the Domain-Wall SM, such as the KK-mode gauge boson phenomenology at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the effect of the KK-mode SM fermions on Higgs boson phenomenology, and the KK-mode fermion search at the LHC with its decay into a corresponding SM fermion and a Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with a spontaneous breaking of the translational invariance in the 5th dimension. We also propose a simple unified picture of localizing all the SM fields.

Human review
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 22 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 5 papers

What it cites · 8 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Uses data or values from 4 papers
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.