Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The asymmetries of the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay and the search of new physics beyond the Standard Model

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 15 Jan 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Thus a careful study on the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay within small $q^2$-region could be helpful for searching new physics beyond the Standard Model.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1801.04808 (version 2)
Pith IDR6BZKZOX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHai-Bing Fu, Tao Zhong, Wei Cheng, Xing-Gang Wu, Zhan Sun. "The asymmetries of the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay and the search of new physics beyond the Standard Model." arXiv:1801.04808 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/R6BZKZOX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,850 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.33 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.27 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.33 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this paper, we compute the forward-backward asymmetry and the isospin asymmetry of the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay. The $B \to K^*$ transition form factors (TFFs) are key components of the decay. To achieve a more accurate QCD prediction, we adopt a chiral correlator for calculating the QCD light-cone sum rules for those TFFs with the purpose of suppressing the uncertain high-twist distribution amplitudes. Our predictions show that the asymmetries under the Standard Model and the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with minimal flavor violation are close in shape for $q^2 \ge 6~{\rm GeV}^2$ and are consistent with the Belle, LHCb and CDF data within errors. When $q^2 < 2~{\rm GeV}^2$, their predictions behave quite differently. Thus a careful study on the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay within small $q^2$-region could be helpful for searching new physics beyond the Standard Model. As a further application, we also apply the $B \to K^*$ TFFs to the branching ratio and longitudinal polarization fraction of the $B\to K^*\nu\bar\nu$ decay within different models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this paper, we compute the forward-backward asymmetry and the isospin asymmetry of the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay. contribution 1.00 0.95 0.04 asserted 0.96
s1 The $B \to K^*$ transition form factors (TFFs) are key components of the decay. background 1.00 0.08 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 To achieve a more accurate QCD prediction, we adopt a chiral correlator for calculating the QCD light-cone sum rules for those TFFs with the purpose of suppressing the uncertain high-twist distribution amplitudes. method 0.99 0.91 0.03 asserted 0.98
s3 Our predictions show that the asymmetries under the Standard Model and the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with minimal flavor violation are close in shape for $q^2 \ge 6~{\rm GeV}^2$ and are consistent with the Belle, LHCb and CDF data within errors. result 1.00 0.91 0.37 asserted 0.88
s4 When $q^2 < 2~{\rm GeV}^2$, their predictions behave quite differently. result 0.99 0.81 0.08 asserted 0.99
s5 Thus a careful study on the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay within small $q^2$-region could be helpful for searching new physics beyond the Standard Model. interpretation 0.91 0.25 0.55 hedged possibility 1.00
s6 As a further application, we also apply the $B \to K^*$ TFFs to the branching ratio and longitudinal polarization fraction of the $B\to K^*\nu\bar\nu$ decay within different models. contribution 0.98 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.91 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this paper, we compute the forward-backward asymmetry and the isospin asymmetry of the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay. The $B \to K^*$ transition form factors (TFFs) are key components of the decay. To achieve a more accurate QCD prediction, we adopt a chiral correlator for calculating the QCD light-cone sum rules for those TFFs with the purpose of suppressing the uncertain high-twist distribution amplitudes. Our predictions show that the asymmetries under the Standard Model and the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with minimal flavor violation are close in shape for $q^2 \ge 6~{\rm GeV}^2$ and are consistent with the Belle, LHCb and CDF data within errors. When $q^2 < 2~{\rm GeV}^2$, their predictions behave quite differently. Thus a careful study on the $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay within small $q^2$-region could be helpful for searching new physics beyond the Standard Model. As a further application, we also apply the $B \to K^*$ TFFs to the branching ratio and longitudinal polarization fraction of the $B\to K^*\nu\bar\nu$ decay within different models.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.