Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Tight Lower Bounds for Locally Differentially Private Selection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1802.02638 v2 pith:AAKTJB4Y submitted 2018-02-07 cs.CR cs.DScs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.DScs.LG
keywords lowerboundlocaltightdifferentiallyprivateprotocolalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We prove a tight lower bound (up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol for optimizing a linear function over the simplex. This lower bound also implies a tight lower bound (again, up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol implementing the exponential mechanism. These results reveal that any local protocol for these problems has exponentially worse dependence on the dimension than corresponding algorithms in the central model. Previously, Kasiviswanathan et al. (FOCS 2008) proved an exponential separation between local and central model algorithms for PAC learning the class of parity functions. In contrast, our lower bound are quantitatively tight, apply to a simple and natural class of linear optimization problems, and our techniques are arguably simpler.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messages

    cs.CR 2019-08 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Single-message shuffled-model frequency estimation has optimal error about min(n^{1/4}, sqrt(B)); multi-message protocols achieve polylogarithmic error with polylogarithmic communication.

  2. Aggregating Votes with Local Differential Privacy: Usefulness, Soundness vs. Indistinguishability

    cs.CR 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New local differential privacy mechanisms for vote aggregation reduce estimation error and bound manipulation risk, improving on Laplace noise for Borda counting.

Pith tools