REVIEW 2 cited by
Tight Lower Bounds for Locally Differentially Private Selection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We prove a tight lower bound (up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol for optimizing a linear function over the simplex. This lower bound also implies a tight lower bound (again, up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol implementing the exponential mechanism. These results reveal that any local protocol for these problems has exponentially worse dependence on the dimension than corresponding algorithms in the central model. Previously, Kasiviswanathan et al. (FOCS 2008) proved an exponential separation between local and central model algorithms for PAC learning the class of parity functions. In contrast, our lower bound are quantitatively tight, apply to a simple and natural class of linear optimization problems, and our techniques are arguably simpler.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messages
Single-message shuffled-model frequency estimation has optimal error about min(n^{1/4}, sqrt(B)); multi-message protocols achieve polylogarithmic error with polylogarithmic communication.
-
Aggregating Votes with Local Differential Privacy: Usefulness, Soundness vs. Indistinguishability
New local differential privacy mechanisms for vote aggregation reduce estimation error and bound manipulation risk, improving on Laplace noise for Borda counting.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.