Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Information Theoretic Interpretation of Deep learning

Machine Learning · Submitted 21 Mar 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Inspired by these results, we established a conjecture of the dynamics of the machinary of deep neural network.

how it is stated · asserted 0.78 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1803.07980 (version 2)
Pith ID6A2ARIOX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationTianchen Zhao. "Information Theoretic Interpretation of Deep learning." arXiv:1803.07980 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/6A2ARIOX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,867 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.83 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We interpret part of the experimental results of Shwartz-Ziv and Tishby [2017]. Inspired by these results, we established a conjecture of the dynamics of the machinary of deep neural network. This conjecture can be used to explain the counterpart result by Saxe et al. [2018].

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We interpret part of the experimental results of Shwartz-Ziv and Tishby [2017]. contribution 0.46 0.54 0.04 asserted 0.97
s1 Inspired by these results, we established a conjecture of the dynamics of the machinary of deep neural network. contribution 1.00 0.91 0.31 asserted 0.78
s2 This conjecture can be used to explain the counterpart result by Saxe et al. [2018]. interpretation 0.53 0.39 0.24 hedged possibility 0.54

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.77 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.60.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We interpret part of the experimental results of Shwartz-Ziv and Tishby [2017]. Inspired by these results, we established a conjecture of the dynamics of the machinary of deep neural network. This conjecture can be used to explain the counterpart result by Saxe et al. [2018].

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 13 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 2 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.