Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Group Sparsity Residual with Non-Local Samples for Image Denoising

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 22 Mar 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed GSR-NLS not only outperforms many state-of-the-art methods, but also delivers the competitive advantage of speed.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1803.08412 (version 1)
Pith IDJO7EFQGA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLan Tang, Qiong Wang, Xinggan Zhang, Xin Yuan, Yechao Bai, Zhiyuan Zha. "Group Sparsity Residual with Non-Local Samples for Image Denoising." arXiv:1803.08412 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/JO7EFQGA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,000 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.43 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Inspired by group-based sparse coding, recently proposed group sparsity residual (GSR) scheme has demonstrated superior performance in image processing. However, one challenge in GSR is to estimate the residual by using a proper reference of the group-based sparse coding (GSC), which is desired to be as close to the truth as possible. Previous researches utilized the estimations from other algorithms (i.e., GMM or BM3D), which are either not accurate or too slow. In this paper, we propose to use the Non-Local Samples (NLS) as reference in the GSR regime for image denoising, thus termed GSR-NLS. More specifically, we first obtain a good estimation of the group sparse coefficients by the image nonlocal self-similarity, and then solve the GSR model by an effective iterative shrinkage algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed GSR-NLS not only outperforms many state-of-the-art methods, but also delivers the competitive advantage of speed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Inspired by group-based sparse coding, recently proposed group sparsity residual (GSR) scheme has demonstrated superior performance in image processing. background 1.00 0.05 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 However, one challenge in GSR is to estimate the residual by using a proper reference of the group-based sparse coding (GSC), which is desired to be as close to the truth as possible. gap 0.71 0.07 0.02 asserted 0.99
s2 Previous researches utilized the estimations from other algorithms (i.e., GMM or BM3D), which are either not accurate or too slow. gap 0.63 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 In this paper, we propose to use the Non-Local Samples (NLS) as reference in the GSR regime for image denoising, thus termed GSR-NLS. contribution 0.97 0.87 0.11 asserted 0.98
s4 More specifically, we first obtain a good estimation of the group sparse coefficients by the image nonlocal self-similarity, and then solve the GSR model by an effective iterative shrinkage algorithm. method 1.00 0.91 0.06 asserted 0.98
s5 Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed GSR-NLS not only outperforms many state-of-the-art methods, but also delivers the competitive advantage of speed. result 1.00 0.95 0.88 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.64.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Inspired by group-based sparse coding, recently proposed group sparsity residual (GSR) scheme has demonstrated superior performance in image processing. However, one challenge in GSR is to estimate the residual by using a proper reference of the group-based sparse coding (GSC), which is desired to be as close to the truth as possible. Previous researches utilized the estimations from other algorithms (i.e., GMM or BM3D), which are either not accurate or too slow. In this paper, we propose to use the Non-Local Samples (NLS) as reference in the GSR regime for image denoising, thus termed GSR-NLS. More specifically, we first obtain a good estimation of the group sparse coefficients by the image nonlocal self-similarity, and then solve the GSR model by an effective iterative shrinkage algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed GSR-NLS not only outperforms many state-of-the-art methods, but also delivers the competitive advantage of speed.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.