Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fair Division Under Cardinality Constraints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.09521 v3 pith:UTHVXMDV submitted 2018-04-25 cs.GT cs.AI

classification cs.GTcs.AI
keywords constraintsgoodscardinalityfairunderdivisionproblemsetting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, among agents, under cardinality constraints and additive valuations. In this setting, we are given a partition of the entire set of goods---i.e., the goods are categorized---and a limit is specified on the number of goods that can be allocated from each category to any agent. The objective here is to find a fair allocation in which the subset of goods assigned to any agent satisfies the given cardinality constraints. This problem naturally captures a number of resource-allocation applications, and is a generalization of the well-studied (unconstrained) fair division problem. The two central notions of fairness, in the context of fair division of indivisible goods, are envy freeness up to one good (EF1) and the (approximate) maximin share guarantee (MMS). We show that the existence and algorithmic guarantees established for these solution concepts in the unconstrained setting can essentially be achieved under cardinality constraints. Specifically, we develop efficient algorithms which compute EF1 and approximately MMS allocations in the constrained setting. Furthermore, focusing on the case wherein all the agents have the same additive valuation, we establish that EF1 allocations exist and can be computed efficiently even under laminar matroid constraints.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Balanced Fair Division for Three Agents under General Valuations and Laminar Constraints

    cs.GT 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Three-agent fair division always admits a balanced EF1^c_g allocation, settling balanced EF1 for monotone valuations and extending to laminar matroid constraints.

  2. Fair Division Among Couples and Small Groups

    cs.GT 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For two couples a balanced EF1 allocation always exists and is efficiently computable, while three or more couples may have no EF1 allocation; for groups of size at most k, an fPO and PROPk allocation can always be fo...

Pith tools