Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Contrastive Hebbian Learning with Random Feedback Weights

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.07406 v1 pith:3Q2LKP6L submitted 2018-06-19 cs.LG q-bio.NCstat.ML

classification cs.LGq-bio.NCstat.ML
keywords learningrandomalgorithmcontrastivematricesclampedfeedbackhebbian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural networks are commonly trained to make predictions through learning algorithms. Contrastive Hebbian learning, which is a powerful rule inspired by gradient backpropagation, is based on Hebb's rule and the contrastive divergence algorithm. It operates in two phases, the forward (or free) phase, where the data are fed to the network, and a backward (or clamped) phase, where the target signals are clamped to the output layer of the network and the feedback signals are transformed through the transpose synaptic weight matrices. This implies symmetries at the synaptic level, for which there is no evidence in the brain. In this work, we propose a new variant of the algorithm, called random contrastive Hebbian learning, which does not rely on any synaptic weights symmetries. Instead, it uses random matrices to transform the feedback signals during the clamped phase, and the neural dynamics are described by first order non-linear differential equations. The algorithm is experimentally verified by solving a Boolean logic task, classification tasks (handwritten digits and letters), and an autoencoding task. This article also shows how the parameters affect learning, especially the random matrices. We use the pseudospectra analysis to investigate further how random matrices impact the learning process. Finally, we discuss the biological plausibility of the proposed algorithm, and how it can give rise to better computational models for learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spiking Neural Networks for Inference and Learning: A Memristor-based Design Perspective

    cs.ET 2019-09 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of memristor-compatible learning for spiking neural networks, centered on device-aware three-factor plasticity rules with pulse-count updates derived from a fitted RRAM conductance model.

Pith tools