Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Why Interpretability in Machine Learning? An Answer Using Distributed Detection and Data Fusion Theory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.09710 v1 pith:TTS7NBCV submitted 2018-06-25 stat.ML cs.ITcs.LGmath.IT

classification stat.MLcs.ITcs.LGmath.IT
keywords humaninterpretabilitylearningmachinemodelperformancesystemclassifier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As artificial intelligence is increasingly affecting all parts of society and life, there is growing recognition that human interpretability of machine learning models is important. It is often argued that accuracy or other similar generalization performance metrics must be sacrificed in order to gain interpretability. Such arguments, however, fail to acknowledge that the overall decision-making system is composed of two entities: the learned model and a human who fuses together model outputs with his or her own information. As such, the relevant performance criteria should be for the entire system, not just for the machine learning component. In this work, we characterize the performance of such two-node tandem data fusion systems using the theory of distributed detection. In doing so, we work in the population setting and model interpretable learned models as multi-level quantizers. We prove that under our abstraction, the overall system of a human with an interpretable classifier outperforms one with a black box classifier.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Preventing the Generation of Inconsistent Sets of Classification Rules

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two algorithms, CFSGS and CFSBE, compute feature-space regions inside which any newly created classification rule will be consistent with an existing set of rules.

Pith tools