REVIEW 1 cited by
Interplay between interlayer exchange and stacking in CrI$_3$ bilayers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We address the interplay between stacking and interlayer exchange for ferromagnetically ordered CrI$_3$, both for bilayers and bulk. Whereas bulk CrI$_3$ is ferromagnetic, both magneto-optical and transport experiments show that interlayer exchange for CrI$_3$ bilayers is antiferromagnetic. Bulk CrI$_3$ is known to assume two crystal structures, rhombohedral and monoclinic, that differ mostly in the stacking between monolayers. Below 210-220 Kelvin, bulk CrI$_3$ orders in a rhombohedral phase. Our density functional theory calculations show a very strong dependence of interlayer exchange and stacking. Specifically, the ground states of both bulk and free-standing CrI$_3$ bilayers are ferromagnetic for the rhombohedral phase. In contrast, the energy difference between both configurations is more than one order of magnitude smaller for the monoclinic phase, and eventually becomes antiferromagnetic when either positive strain or on-site Hubbard interactions ($U \geq 3$) are considered. We also explore the interplay between interlayer hybrydization and stacking, using a Wannier basis, and between interlayer hybrydization and relative magnetic alignment for CrI$_3$ bilayers, that helps to account for the very large tunnel magnetoresistance obvserved in recent experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Low-temperature monoclinic layer stacking in atomically thin CrI$_3$ crystals
Polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopy shows that atomically thin CrI3 remains in the monoclinic stacking phase at low temperature, unlike bulk CrI3, explaining the antiferromagnetic order in thin multilayers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.