REVIEW 2 cited by
Generating Synthetic but Plausible Healthcare Record Datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Generating datasets that "look like" given real ones is an interesting tasks for healthcare applications of ML and many other fields of science and engineering. In this paper we propose a new method of general application to binary datasets based on a method for learning the parameters of a latent variable moment that we have previously used for clustering patient datasets. We compare our method with a recent proposal (MedGan) based on generative adversarial methods and find that the synthetic datasets we generate are globally more realistic in at least two senses: real and synthetic instances are harder to tell apart by Random Forests, and the MMD statistic. The most likely explanation is that our method does not suffer from the "mode collapse" which is an admitted problem of GANs. Additionally, the generative models we generate are easy to interpret, unlike the rather obscure GANs. Our experiments are performed on two patient datasets containing ICD-9 diagnostic codes: the publicly available MIMIC-III dataset and a dataset containing admissions for congestive heart failure during 7 years at Hospital de Sant Pau in Barcelona.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stage-Diff: Stage-wise Long-Term Time Series Generation Based on Diffusion Models
Stage-Diff generates long multivariate time series in stages, decomposing each stage into multi-scale trends and using multi-channel convolution to carry information between stages.
-
Synthetic Tabular Data Generation: A Comparative Survey for Modern Techniques
A survey that categorizes tabular data synthesis by generation objectives and adds a benchmark comparison of six models on Adult and CreditRisk.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.