Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Per-decision Multi-step Temporal Difference Learning with Control Variates

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.01830 v1 pith:7DJ2F2SE submitted 2018-07-05 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords learningmulti-stepcontroldifferencetemporalvariatesalgorithmsestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-step temporal difference (TD) learning is an important approach in reinforcement learning, as it unifies one-step TD learning with Monte Carlo methods in a way where intermediate algorithms can outperform either extreme. They address a bias-variance trade off between reliance on current estimates, which could be poor, and incorporating longer sampled reward sequences into the updates. Especially in the off-policy setting, where the agent aims to learn about a policy different from the one generating its behaviour, the variance in the updates can cause learning to diverge as the number of sampled rewards used in the estimates increases. In this paper, we introduce per-decision control variates for multi-step TD algorithms, and compare them to existing methods. Our results show that including the control variates can greatly improve performance on both on and off-policy multi-step temporal difference learning tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Survey of Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms to Practical Challenges

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive but flawed survey of RL algorithms that catalogs many methods and applications without rigorous comparative analysis.

Pith tools