Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Differentially Private False Discovery Rate Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.04209 v2 pith:6YEXXC6M submitted 2018-07-11 math.ST cs.LGstat.TH

classification math.STcs.LGstat.TH
keywords privateprocedurecontrolfalsedifferentialdifferentiallydiscoveryfirst
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Differential privacy provides a rigorous framework for privacy-preserving data analysis. This paper proposes the first differentially private procedure for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple hypothesis testing. Inspired by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (BHq), our approach is to first repeatedly add noise to the logarithms of the $p$-values to ensure differential privacy and to select an approximately smallest $p$-value serving as a promising candidate at each iteration; the selected $p$-values are further supplied to the BHq and our private procedure releases only the rejected ones. Moreover, we develop a new technique that is based on a backward submartingale for proving FDR control of a broad class of multiple testing procedures, including our private procedure, and both the BHq step-up and step-down procedures. As a novel aspect, the proof works for arbitrary dependence between the true null and false null test statistics, while FDR control is maintained up to a small multiplicative factor.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Aggregating Votes with Local Differential Privacy: Usefulness, Soundness vs. Indistinguishability

    cs.CR 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New local differential privacy mechanisms for vote aggregation reduce estimation error and bound manipulation risk, improving on Laplace noise for Borda counting.

Pith tools