REVIEW 1 cited by
Chest X-rays Classification: A Multi-Label and Fine-Grained Problem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The widely used ChestX-ray14 dataset addresses an important medical image classification problem and has the following caveats: 1) many lung pathologies are visually similar, 2) a variant of diseases including lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pneumonia are present in a single scan, i.e. multiple labels and 3) The incidence of healthy images is much larger than diseased samples, creating imbalanced data. These properties are common in medical domain. Existing literature uses stateof- the-art DensetNet/Resnet models being transfer learned where output neurons of the networks are trained for individual diseases to cater for multiple diseases labels in each image. However, most of them don't consider relationship between multiple classes. In this work we have proposed a novel error function, Multi-label Softmax Loss (MSML), to specifically address the properties of multiple labels and imbalanced data. Moreover, we have designed deep network architecture based on fine-grained classification concept that incorporates MSML. We have evaluated our proposed method on various network backbones and showed consistent performance improvements of AUC-ROC scores on the ChestX-ray14 dataset. The proposed error function provides a new method to gain improved performance across wider medical datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Time Frequency Analysis of EMG Signal for Gesture Recognition using Fine grained Features
XMANet, a cross-layer mutual attention network originally designed for image classification, is applied to EMG spectrograms and scalograms, yielding small and inconsistently reported accuracy improvements over baseline CNNs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.