A Unified Analysis of AdaGrad with Weighted Aggregation and Momentum Acceleration
read the original abstract
Integrating adaptive learning rate and momentum techniques into SGD leads to a large class of efficiently accelerated adaptive stochastic algorithms, such as AdaGrad, RMSProp, Adam, AccAdaGrad, \textit{etc}. In spite of their effectiveness in practice, there is still a large gap in their theories of convergences, especially in the difficult non-convex stochastic setting. To fill this gap, we propose \emph{weighted AdaGrad with unified momentum}, dubbed AdaUSM, which has the main characteristics that (1) it incorporates a unified momentum scheme which covers both the heavy ball momentum and the Nesterov accelerated gradient momentum; (2) it adopts a novel weighted adaptive learning rate that can unify the learning rates of AdaGrad, AccAdaGrad, Adam, and RMSProp. Moreover, when we take polynomially growing weights in AdaUSM, we obtain its $\mathcal{O}(\log(T)/\sqrt{T})$ convergence rate in the non-convex stochastic setting. We also show that the adaptive learning rates of Adam and RMSProp correspond to taking exponentially growing weights in AdaUSM, thereby providing a new perspective for understanding Adam and RMSProp. Lastly, comparative experiments of AdaUSM against SGD with momentum, AdaGrad, AdaEMA, Adam, and AMSGrad on various deep learning models and datasets are also carried out.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Accelerated Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization: Escape Trajectories From Strict Saddle Points and Convergence to Local Minima
Theoretical analysis of accelerated gradient methods showing almost-sure escape from strict saddles and linear exit times, plus a subclass achieving near-optimal convergence to local minima in convex neighborhoods of ...
-
Adaptive Federated Optimization
Proposes federated adaptive optimizers (FedAdagrad, FedAdam, FedYogi) with convergence analysis for non-convex objectives under data heterogeneity and reports empirical gains over FedAvg.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.