REVIEW 1 cited by
Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Information
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
How do neural language models keep track of number agreement between subject and verb? We show that `diagnostic classifiers', trained to predict number from the internal states of a language model, provide a detailed understanding of how, when, and where this information is represented. Moreover, they give us insight into when and where number information is corrupted in cases where the language model ends up making agreement errors. To demonstrate the causal role played by the representations we find, we then use agreement information to influence the course of the LSTM during the processing of difficult sentences. Results from such an intervention reveal a large increase in the language model's accuracy. Together, these results show that diagnostic classifiers give us an unrivalled detailed look into the representation of linguistic information in neural models, and demonstrate that this knowledge can be used to improve their performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
StructFormer: Document Structure-based Masked Attention and its Impact on Language Model Pre-Training
Using section headers as global attention tokens during masked-language-model pretraining improves downstream document-structure tasks such as SciREX salient clustering, with no clear drop on GLUE.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.