Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Shallow vs deep learning architectures for white matter lesion segmentation in the early stages of multiple sclerosis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.03185 v1 pith:U7F3XHV6 submitted 2018-09-10 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML
keywords deepsegmentationshallowarchitecturelearninglesion-wisemethodsmultiple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we present a comparison of a shallow and a deep learning architecture for the automated segmentation of white matter lesions in MR images of multiple sclerosis patients. In particular, we train and test both methods on early stage disease patients, to verify their performance in challenging conditions, more similar to a clinical setting than what is typically provided in multiple sclerosis segmentation challenges. Furthermore, we evaluate a prototype naive combination of the two methods, which refines the final segmentation. All methods were trained on 32 patients, and the evaluation was performed on a pure test set of 73 cases. Results show low lesion-wise false positives (30%) for the deep learning architecture, whereas the shallow architecture yields the best Dice coefficient (63%) and volume difference (19%). Combining both shallow and deep architectures further improves the lesion-wise metrics (69% and 26% lesion-wise true and false positive rate, respectively).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools