Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Playing the Game of Universal Adversarial Perturbations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.07802 v2 pith:UIGF556S submitted 2018-09-20 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML
keywords adversarialclassificationgameplayerrobusttraininguniversalclassifiers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the problem of learning classifiers robust to universal adversarial perturbations. While prior work approaches this problem via robust optimization, adversarial training, or input transformation, we instead phrase it as a two-player zero-sum game. In this new formulation, both players simultaneously play the same game, where one player chooses a classifier that minimizes a classification loss whilst the other player creates an adversarial perturbation that increases the same loss when applied to every sample in the training set. By observing that performing a classification (respectively creating adversarial samples) is the best response to the other player, we propose a novel extension of a game-theoretic algorithm, namely fictitious play, to the domain of training robust classifiers. Finally, we empirically show the robustness and versatility of our approach in two defence scenarios where universal attacks are performed on several image classification datasets -- CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and ImageNet.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A certified robustness radius says nothing about whether a sample is clean or correctly predicted, so certification does not yet imply model security.

Pith tools