Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Role of hubs in the synergistic spread of behavior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.11041 v4 pith:5V5XZEKK submitted 2018-09-28 physics.soc-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Role of hubs in the synergistic spread of behavior

classification physics.soc-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords hubsmotssynergisticalphabehaviordominanceevennetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

The spread of behavior in a society has two major features: the synergy of multiple spreaders and the dominance of hubs. While strong synergy is known to induce mixed-order transitions (MOTs) at percolation, the effects of hubs on the phenomena are yet to be clarified. By analytically solving the generalized epidemic process on random scale-free networks with the power-law degree distribution $p_k \sim k^{-\alpha}$, we clarify how the dominance of hubs in social networks affects the conditions for MOTs. Our results show that, for $\alpha < 4$, an abundance of hubs drive MOTs, even if a synergistic spreading event requires an arbitrarily large number of adjacent spreaders. In particular, for $2 < \alpha < 3$, we find that a global cascade is possible even when only synergistic spreading events are allowed. These transition properties are substantially different from those of cooperative contagions, which are another class of synergistic cascading processes exhibiting MOTs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.