Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Neutron Lifetime Discrepancy as a Sign of a Dark Sector?

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 1 Oct 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We summarize our recent proposal of explaining the discrepancy between the bottle and beam measurements of the neutron lifetime through the existence of a dark sector, which the neutron can decay to with a branching fraction 1%.

how it is stated · asserted 0.54 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1810.00862 (version 2)
Pith IDS6LGUB57, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBartosz Fornal, Benjamin Grinstein. "Neutron Lifetime Discrepancy as a Sign of a Dark Sector?." arXiv:1810.00862 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/S6LGUB57
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,287 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.88 · compares with prior results 0.46 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We summarize our recent proposal of explaining the discrepancy between the bottle and beam measurements of the neutron lifetime through the existence of a dark sector, which the neutron can decay to with a branching fraction 1%. We show that viable particle physics models for such neutron dark decays can be constructed and we briefly comment on recent developments in this area.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We summarize our recent proposal of explaining the discrepancy between the bottle and beam measurements of the neutron lifetime through the existence of a dark sector, which the neutron can decay to with a branching fraction 1%. contribution 0.96 0.56 0.78 asserted 0.54
s1 We show that viable particle physics models for such neutron dark decays can be constructed and we briefly comment on recent developments in this area. contribution 0.96 0.79 0.16 asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.43 · evidence from argument 0.72.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We summarize our recent proposal of explaining the discrepancy between the bottle and beam measurements of the neutron lifetime through the existence of a dark sector, which the neutron can decay to with a branching fraction 1%. We show that viable particle physics models for such neutron dark decays can be constructed and we briefly comment on recent developments in this area.

Human review
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 2 papers
  • The difference between the outcomes of the two types of measurements is explained by the existence of a neutron dark decay channel with a branching fraction 1%.

    Dark Side of the Neutron? · 0.99

  • We propose to explain this anomaly by a dark decay channel for the neutron, involving one or more dark sector particles in the final state.

    Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly · 0.91

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 3 papers
  • Recently Fornal and Grinstein [ref] have proposed to explain the neutron lifetime anomaly, related to a discrepancy between experimental values of the neutron lifetime measured in bottle and beam experiments, through contributions of the neutron dark matter decay modes $n →χ+ γ$, $n →χ+ ϕ$ and $n →χ+γ^* →χ+ e^- + e^+$, where $χ$ and $ϕ$ are dark matter fermion and scalar boson, respectively, $γ$ and $γ^*$ are real and virtual photons, and $(e^- e^+)$ is the electron–positron pair.

    Neutron Dark Matter Decays and Correlation Coefficients of Neutron Beta Decays · Introduction · 0.80

  • The window for neutron dark decay width can be simply determined as the difference of the two observed values, [equation] For the neutron dark decay modes, there are many discussions in specific models, see [ref] and references therein, but there are few from the EFT perspective [ref] .

    Dark Sector Effective Field Theory · Neutron lifetime anomaly from dark decay · 0.91

  • Numerous studies have explored different possibilities [ref] .

    Neutron Decay to a Non-Abelian Dark Sector · Introduction · 0.99

What it cites · 4 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.