Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SAVOIAS: A Diverse, Multi-Category Visual Complexity Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.01771 v1 pith:CKPIFSSA submitted 2018-10-03 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords complexityvisualsavoiasimageimagesareascategoriesdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual complexity identifies the level of intricacy and details in an image or the level of difficulty to describe the image. It is an important concept in a variety of areas such as cognitive psychology, computer vision and visualization, and advertisement. Yet, efforts to create large, downloadable image datasets with diverse content and unbiased groundtruthing are lacking. In this work, we introduce Savoias, a visual complexity dataset that compromises of more than 1,400 images from seven image categories relevant to the above research areas, namely Scenes, Advertisements, Visualization and infographics, Objects, Interior design, Art, and Suprematism. The images in each category portray diverse characteristics including various low-level and high-level features, objects, backgrounds, textures and patterns, text, and graphics. The ground truth for Savoias is obtained by crowdsourcing more than 37,000 pairwise comparisons of images using the forced-choice methodology and with more than 1,600 contributors. The resulting relative scores are then converted to absolute visual complexity scores using the Bradley-Terry method and matrix completion. When applying five state-of-the-art algorithms to analyze the visual complexity of the images in the Savoias dataset, we found that the scores obtained from these baseline tools only correlate well with crowdsourced labels for abstract patterns in the Suprematism category (Pearson correlation r=0.84). For the other categories, in particular, the objects and advertisement categories, low correlation coefficients were revealed (r=0.3 and 0.56, respectively). These findings suggest that (1) state-of-the-art approaches are mostly insufficient and (2) Savoias enables category-specific method development, which is likely to improve the impact of visual complexity analysis on specific application areas, including computer vision.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Single-pass Adaptive Image Tokenization for Minimum Program Search

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    KARL conditions a tokenizer on a target reconstruction loss and learns halting probabilities that produce an adaptive token count in a single forward pass.

  2. Complexity in Complexity: Understanding Visual Complexity Through Structure, Color, and Surprise

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Visual complexity is not captured by segmentation counts alone; multi-scale gradients, color diversity, and LLM-generated surprise scores improve prediction on several datasets, including a new Surprising Visual Genome set.

Pith tools