Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CSI-Net: Unified Human Body Characterization and Pose Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.03064 v2 pith:AVI4DAXT submitted 2018-10-07 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords bodycsi-netrecognitioncharacterizationhandposeunifiedaction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We build CSI-Net, a unified Deep Neural Network~(DNN), to learn the representation of WiFi signals. Using CSI-Net, we jointly solved two body characterization problems: biometrics estimation (including body fat, muscle, water, and bone rates) and person recognition. We also demonstrated the application of CSI-Net on two distinctive pose recognition tasks: the hand sign recognition (fine-scaled action of the hand) and falling detection (coarse-scaled motion of the body).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SHIELD: A Secure and Highly Enhanced Integrated Learning for Robust Deepfake Detection against Adversarial Attacks

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims that a collaborative defense generator plus triplet learning keeps audio deepfake detectors at roughly 98 percent accuracy against GAN-based anti-forensic attacks.

  2. Why Commodity WiFi Sensors Fail at Multi-Person Gait Identification: A Systematic Analysis Using ESP32

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On commodity ESP32 WiFi sensors, six blind-source-separation methods all fail to achieve reliable multi-person gait identification (39–56% accuracy), suggesting a sensing-quality limit rather than an algorithmic fix.

Pith tools