Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Tractable Probabilistic Models for Moral Responsibility and Blame

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.03736 v3 pith:M2KLZQUP submitted 2018-10-08 cs.AI cs.LGcs.LO

classification cs.AIcs.LGcs.LO
keywords learningmodelsmoralresponsibilitysystemsautomaticallybeenblame
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Moral responsibility is a major concern in autonomous systems, with applications ranging from self-driving cars to kidney exchanges. Although there have been recent attempts to formalise responsibility and blame, among similar notions, the problem of learning within these formalisms has been unaddressed. From the viewpoint of such systems, the urgent questions are: (a) How can models of moral scenarios and blameworthiness be extracted and learnt automatically from data? (b) How can judgements be computed effectively and efficiently, given the split-second decision points faced by some systems? By building on constrained tractable probabilistic learning, we propose and implement a hybrid (between data-driven and rule-based methods) learning framework for inducing models of such scenarios automatically from data and reasoning tractably from them. We report on experiments that compare our system with human judgement in three illustrative domains: lung cancer staging, teamwork management, and trolley problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Experiential AI

    cs.CY 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Artistic practice can make the boundaries and reasoning of AI systems visible and decipherable, and the Experiential AI agenda organizes artist-scientist residencies to test that claim against the limits of technical ...

Pith tools