Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Closer Look at Structured Pruning for Neural Network Compression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.04622 v3 pith:V5D3QMVQ submitted 2018-10-10 stat.ML cs.CVcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.CVcs.LG
keywords networkstructurednetworksprunedpruningreducedtrainedarchitectures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Structured pruning is a popular method for compressing a neural network: given a large trained network, one alternates between removing channel connections and fine-tuning; reducing the overall width of the network. However, the efficacy of structured pruning has largely evaded scrutiny. In this paper, we examine ResNets and DenseNets obtained through structured pruning-and-tuning and make two interesting observations: (i) reduced networks---smaller versions of the original network trained from scratch---consistently outperform pruned networks; (ii) if one takes the architecture of a pruned network and then trains it from scratch it is significantly more competitive. Furthermore, these architectures are easy to approximate: we can prune once and obtain a family of new, scalable network architectures that can simply be trained from scratch. Finally, we compare the inference speed of reduced and pruned networks on hardware, and show that reduced networks are significantly faster. Code is available at https://github.com/BayesWatch/pytorch-prunes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pruning Deep Convolutional Neural Network Using Conditional Mutual Information

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A conditional mutual information ranking with Scree test and X-means cutoffs prunes 36% of VGG16 filters on CIFAR-10 with only 0.32% accuracy loss.

Pith tools