Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Large $N$ phase transition in $T \overline{T}$-deformed $2d$ Yang-Mills theory on the sphere

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 12 Oct 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that the Douglas-Kazakov phase transition persists for a range of values of the deformation parameter, and that the critical area is lowered.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1810.05404 (version 2)
Pith IDA7GADPSB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLeonardo Santilli, Miguel Tierz. "Large $N$ phase transition in $T \overline{T}$-deformed $2d$ Yang-Mills theory on the sphere." arXiv:1810.05404 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/A7GADPSB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,910 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.23 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.20 · compares with prior results 0.62 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the partition function of a $T \overline{T}$-deformed version of Yang-Mills theory on the two-sphere. We show that the Douglas-Kazakov phase transition persists for a range of values of the deformation parameter, and that the critical area is lowered. The transition is of third order and also induced by instantons, whose contributions we characterize.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the partition function of a $T \overline{T}$-deformed version of Yang-Mills theory on the two-sphere. contribution 0.96 0.88 0.04 asserted 0.68
s1 We show that the Douglas-Kazakov phase transition persists for a range of values of the deformation parameter, and that the critical area is lowered. result 1.00 0.95 0.77 asserted 1.00
s2 The transition is of third order and also induced by instantons, whose contributions we characterize. result 0.99 0.89 0.22 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the partition function of a $T \overline{T}$-deformed version of Yang-Mills theory on the two-sphere. We show that the Douglas-Kazakov phase transition persists for a range of values of the deformation parameter, and that the critical area is lowered. The transition is of third order and also induced by instantons, whose contributions we characterize.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

24 arXiv papers cite this in 50 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 24 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 3 papers
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 17 papers

What it cites · 39 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 2 papers
Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 32 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.